Vesta Copestakes
Email Vesta
Blog Home Page

Welcome to the West County Gazette EXTRA! Blog. Your contributions are always welcome...all-month-long. Just e-mail me. Thanks for keeping the lines of communication open for our neighbors of Sonoma County home towns.


Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Sonoma County Protests Propisition 8



RALLY TO PROTEST THE PASSING OF PROPOSITION 8

Rallies are being held around the state and nationally to protest the state of California writing discrimination into our constitution.

We will be rallying in Sonoma County
Saturday November 15th, 10:30am at Courthouse Square in Santa Rosa.
between 3rd & 4th Streets at Mendocino Avenue


Come and show your support. All are welcome!
A lawsuit is being filed, we're trying to get Sonoma County to sign on to the lawsuit as a petitioner. Our Democratic State Representatives have signed on to a "Friends of the Court" brief to show their support for equal rights.
Come and stand for equality!


Below are two essays submitted to WCG on this subject - there are more. Thanks for reading.


PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF THE MINORITY
FROM THE TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY

The Saga of Proposition 8

By Maddy Hirshfield

Election Night, November 4th, 2008 will go down as a night of mixed results and mixed emotions. Never has my heart been so lifted and so broken all at once. The same night that brought an end to the wretched truism that only a white man could be elected president, brought us news that the people of California had decided to enshrine bigotry and discrimination into our state constitution.

As of 1:09 pm, Monday November 10, Prop 8 stood at 52.3% Yes and 47.7% No. Out of almost 11 million votes cast that's a difference of a little less than half a million. There's a law suit in process that Los Angeles; San Francisco and Santa Clara have filed and the wheels are turning to get Sonoma County signed on as a co-petitioner.

Proposition 8 is but the latest chapter in a tortured story of the struggle for equal rights, a story of the intolerant seeking to use the most sacred tools of democracy to demonize and marginalize those with whom they disagree. In 2000, its predecessor, Proposition 22, was overwhelmingly passed in California. Prop 22 consisted of fourteen words: "Only marriage between a man and women is valid or recognized in California." On May 15th, 2008, the Republican-dominated, moderately conservative California Supreme Court struck down Proposition 22. Chief Justice Ron George wrote for the majority: "Our state now recognizes that an individual's capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship with another person and responsibly to care for and raise children does not depend upon the individual's sexual orientation," The statement by George went on: "An individual's sexual orientation -- like a person's race or gender -- does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights."

At that point, the only thing left for those in opposition to marriage equality was to have those same fourteen words written into our Constitution. The good news: All they had was fear and intimidation. The bad news: fear and intimidation worked.

The lawsuit now being filed is an argument over whether Proposition 8 constitutes an "amendment" or a "revision" as each needs to find its way to the ballot via a different path. But that's for the legal types to sort out. On the practical side, I simply do not understand how it's possible to write discrimination INTO the constitution. What if a group of people got together and were successful getting an initiative on the ballot that would amend our Constitution to make it illegal for Latinos to have bank accounts, or for people of color to sit anywhere on the bus they wanted, or drink from the water fountain of their choosing. And let's for argument sake say that amendment to the Constitution passed by a majority of voters. Would we then simply sit back and say, "Oh well, the people have spoken?" Of course not!

Our adversaries say gays have all the rights of marriage now with domestic partnership. Even if that were true -- which it is not -- we learned a long time ago that separate is not equal. Back in the days when people of color had to ride in the back of the bus and drink from separate fountains they still reached their destinations and had their thirst quenched. But we stopped doing that because we figured out it was wrong to treat people differently ... and it still is.

However, here is my glass-half-full view of things as we move forward in this process.

• Statewide, we came so much closer to defeating Prop 8 than we did with Prop 22 in 2000.

• We here in Sonoma County turned Prop 8 down by more than 40 percentage points, we only defeated Prop 22 by 6.

• I've received beautiful, supportive emails from friends who say they just don't understand. And they tell me about conversations with co-workers who feel the same.

• I also get emails from supporters who tell me they know it's coming because they listen to their 12-year-old kids talking with their friends, and the 12-year-olds don't get what the problem is either.

• And ... Barack Obama was elected President of the United States.

I literally sobbed through our new President-elect's entire acceptance speech. And when he got to the part where he said "all Americans" must come together, "black, white, young, old, gay, straight"... a voice in my head kept saying, "it's going to be all right" over and over again, "it's going to be all right."

I believe in "protecting the rights of the minority from the tyranny of the majority" and I have faith that's exactly what we will do.

I also have faith that it will be all right because the majority will soon be the minority. Those 12 year olds are growing up … and we older folks live to fight another day.

Onward!

Maddy Hirshfield is a long time political activist. She currently works for Assemblywoman Patty Berg who recently signed on to a "Friend of the Court" brief along with a majority of other legislators to overturn Prop 8."

--------------

An open letter to supporters of Prop 8:

My name is Sabina and I and coming out of the closet to tell you...that I'm left-handed. Yes I know that it's been apparent for most of my life, but I need to publicly state it.

What's the big deal about being a lefty? Well these days society's majority of right-handers doesn't look down on the 10% of us who aren't, but that hasn't been the case for most of history.

The settlers of this country used left-handedness as evidence of being in league with the Devil. Yes, being a southpaw in Salem was proof of being a witch and reason enough to burn or drown you.

Being left-handed was always seen as being suspect, of not being normal, of being other. The Romans considered the right side the source of good, and all negative things as emanating from the left. In fact, the Latin for "the left side" is sinister, with all the connotations and meanings that word still carries today.

Even as recently as the last century being left-handed was looked on as being wrong somehow. My great-uncle Alberto was born lefty. His family tied his arm to his side and forced him to use his right hand. In the end, his community still looked at him as a left-handed man who was using his right instead.

And why this suspicion of lefties? No one has ever been able to give me a satisfactory reason. I hear a lot of stuff about the Bible and "the right-hand of G-d," about how it doesn't look normal, about being taught to think that way. Mostly I hear about how being different from the norm is wrong.

Luckily for me, people--and society-- have the ability to change their views. When it became apparent that I was left-handed, my parents did not try to change me. In fact, my family and community did not even give any notice to it. It was just a part of who I was, along with my blue eyes or my brown hair. And while it can sometimes be a challenge to be a lefty--guitars are strung wrong, scissors don't cut correctly, the design on my coffee mug never faces me when I drink from it--I know that being different is not seen as being not-normal.

By the way, I also happen to be Jewish and gay. Most people have let go of their discrimination of the former; it's not seen as acceptable for Americans to voice anti-Semitic comments. I look forward to the day when you let go of your fear of the latter as well. You can change the way you've been taught to look at people who are different from you.

Sabina Fried
Sebastopol

Labels: , ,


Read article »

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Election 2008 - Sonoma County & the Nation- LETTERS



Thank you for your comments - I will post them as they come in. This is an exciting time in all our lives for many reasons. We won some, we lost some - but the bottom line is we have a lot of work to do to heal our nation and bring our country closer to the values that established our government: Freedom and Justice for All. As the saying goes: be part of the solution.

I'll post new comments from the top down from here out - thanks for checking in!

Apparently we're still on hold for the 5th District Supervisor race - so when I know, I'll post the results.

Thank You!

-------------------------
Newsflash!!! Santa Rosa! Sebastopol! The Scooter Lady is flying an American flag on her Yamaha! Could it be the election????

Love , Cecile Lusby

-----------------------------

Whoopee! Now I can dust off The Flag and hang it up proudly once again.
Yours in euphoria, Joyce

-------------------------

Dear V,
Frankly with Barack Obama as President I am so elated that even the Prop 8 is not frightening -- now we don't have to fear about the Supreme Court for at least 4 years -- hopefully 8 -- and that, will ultimately be the way to make sure we all have equal rights...

I have received emails from my family all over the world with congratulations -- and mostly they are conservative -- but they are all elated about the US and the world's future now....

Oh, and California high speed rail -- about bloody time...

David ;)

---------------------------

Dear Vesta:

I am disgusted now that Prop 8 did not pass. I want to encourage the gay community to not be so polite next time and bring up the fact that the in all the Bibles of the homophobic church people, that it states that "adulterers and fornicators do not inherit the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6:9-11)." Also, in the Hebrew scriptures, those horny heterosexual busted in the act were stoned to death. Let us all create a new proposition and reinstate the Biblical stoning law for all the hypocritical church people that are shacking up-living in sin, having heterosexual sex before they are married, cheating on spouses, after years of having sex with family members who then resort to raping women, having sex with children and animals.

I mention the above crimes against humanity because I know of so many King Henry VIII inspired Protestant religions that "do not consider such atrocities as cheating on their spouses so that their partners do not have scriptural backing to get a divorce and get away from them." Especially "if their victims did not scream bloody murder with a gun pointed at their head in the middle of nowhere & had two to three witnesses to the act. (2 Corinthians 13:1; 1 Timothy 5:19) The same turn the other cheek to the pervert rule applies if more than one victim has been attacked by the same garden variety fruitcake, and statistically a Protestant Caucasian and heterosexual male. This makes their houses of worship a safe haven for sex offenders yet demonizes their victims. These are scriptures that we are told "are inspired of God" that were most likely written by horny old goats that could empathize with such swine to let them get away with it. I think an intelligent higher power would be insulted to have such low class laws be slanderously written in stone by imperfect men and have to take the blame for them.

Heterosexual "loose conduct" as Christians like to call it, cheapens their relationship with their creator and their marriage is not sacred in the eyes of God (Hebrews 13:4). I know my hypocritical horny Christian neighbors married and divorced a few times with several sets of kids will disagree with me as they say "what gay people do in the bedroom is unorthodox." They have taken a Sharpie and blacked out where it says next to homosexuals which they have highlighted in bright yellow, "Do not be misled...neither fornicators and adulterers will inherit the kingdom of God." Sorry Christians...you are on the same playing field as regards to "sin" as homosexuals. One sin is not greater than the other. Now back to that proposition, let's get the stoning of heterosexuals on the ballot next time. Who knows, maybe it can be made into one of those tacky American reality shows! I think that would be a big hit with a never ending supply of cast members! (humor)

I am a heterosexual woman that is sick of the hypocritical application of the scriptures that only benefits the majority of the population. Nine times of ten, homosexuals have nothing to do with heterosexual divorce or bringing down the scared institution of it. I think that "rafter" scripture should apply here since there is much husband and wife swapping and perversions in so called "Christian" churches among the heterosexuals in the congregation that account for about 95% of the moral atrophy in our society. Thanks for hearing me gripe!

Sincerely glad Obama won,

Rachele Ketchem
Sebastopol

----------------------

MY NEW MANTRA IS IF BARAK CAN DO IT THEN I WILL KEEP GOING TOO - Sandra

-------------------------

Submitted by Carole and Big Man:

An Open Letter to Barack Obama - By Alice Walker (Nov. 5, 2008)
Today at
8:44am | Nov. 5, 2008

http://www.theroot.com/id/48726

Dear Brother Obama,

You have no idea, really, of how profound this moment is for us. Us being the black people of the Southern United States. You think you know, because you are thoughtful, and you have studied our history. But seeing you deliver the torch so many others before you carried, year after year,
decade after decade, century after century, only to be struck down before igniting the flame of justice and of law, is almost more than the heart can bear. And yet, this observation is not intended to burden you, for you are of a different time, and, indeed, because of all the relay
runners before you, North America is a different place. It is really only to say: Well done. We knew, through all the generations, that you were with us, in us, the best of the spirit of Africa and of the Americas. Knowing this, that you would actually appear, someday, was part of our
strength. Seeing you take your rightful place, based solely on your wisdom, stamina and character, is a balm for the weary warriors of hope, previously only sung about.

I would advise you to remember that you did not create the disaster that the world is experiencing, and you alone are not responsible for bringing the world back to balance. A primary responsibility that you do have, however, is to cultivate happiness in your own life. To make a schedule that permits sufficient time of rest and play with your gorgeous wife and
lovely daughters. And so on. One gathers that your family is large. We are used to seeing men in the White House soon become juiceless and as white-haired as the building; we notice their wives and children looking strained and stressed. They soon have smiles so lacking in joy that they remind us of scissors. This is no way to lead. Nor does your family deserve this fate. One way of thinking about all this is: It is so bad now that there is no excuse not to relax. From your happy, relaxed state, you can model real success, which is all that so many people in the world
really want. They may buy endless cars and houses and furs and gobble up all the attention and space they can manage, or barely manage, but this is because it is not yet clear to them that success is truly an inside job. That it is within the reach of almost everyone.

I would further advise you not to take on other people's enemies. Most damage that others do to us is out of fear, humiliation and pain. Those feelings occur in all of us, not just in those of us who profess a certain religious or racial devotion. We must learn actually not to have
enemies, but only confused adversaries who are ourselves in disguise. It is understood by all that you are commander in chief of the United States and are sworn to protect our beloved country; this we understand, completely. However, as my mother used to say, quoting a Bible with which
I often fought, "hate the sin, but love the sinner." There must be no more crushing of whole communities, no more torture, no more dehumanizing as a means of ruling a people's spirit. This has already happened to people of color, poor people, women, children. We see where this leads, where it has led.

A good model of how to "work with the enemy" internally is presented by the Dalai Lama, in his endless caretaking of his soul as he confronts the Chinese government that invaded Tibet. Because, finally, it is the soul that must be preserved, if one is to remain a credible leader. All else might be lost; but when the soul dies, the connection to earth, to peoples, to animals, to rivers, to mountain ranges, purple and majestic, also dies. And your smile, with which we watch you do gracious battle with unjust characterizations, distortions and lies, is that expression of healthy self-worth, spirit and soul, that, kept happy and free and relaxed, can find an answering smile in all of us, lighting our way, and brightening the world.

We are the ones we have been waiting for.

In Peace and Joy,
Alice Walker

---------------------

Obama's campaign, and its success, reminds me of how the Republican party laid claim to the American flag after 911. Democrats everywhere were saying “it's our flag, too!” Now whites are looking at Obama and saying - he's our white man, too. The beauty of this man - beyond his incredible intelligence, his calm demeanor and everything else exceptional about him - is that he is multi-racial. He IS the American melting pot. We can ALL claim to be in his blood - his blood in ours. We are all ONE! - Vesta

------------------

PROFESSORS AVAILABLE FOR COMMENT ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
- POLITICAL, CULTURAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ISSUES


DR. DON ROMESBURG, a historian and professor of Women's and Gender Studies, is available for discussion of political and cultural issues regarding same-sex marriage. Dr. Romesburg is currently teaching an entire undergraduate course framed around the social, economic, political and cultural issues related to same-sex marriage.

He is doing research on the relationship between political discourses about marriage equality and LGBT civil rights and cultural representations of queer youth. Romesburg has also lectured on issues of race and gender in the battle over Proposition 8.

Romesburg is one of the many same-sex couples married in San Francisco in 2004 and again in California after the state's Supreme Court ruling earlier this year. He lives with his husband and daughter in San Francisco.

Office: 707.664.2474
Cell: 415.850.8580
Email: romesbur@sonoma.edu



DR. JULIE SHULMAN, Assistant Professor of Counseilng and a licensed psychologist, is available for discussion regarding the mental health of individuals in same-sex couples.

She can comment on the challenges and stressors of people in same-sex relationships, and she can specificaly address the experiences of marriage legislation and marriage access among people who are in same-sex relationships, including those in legal marriages and domestic partnerships.

Dr. Shulman teaches master's students training to be professional counselors, specilalizing in women and sexual minorities. She has presented her research at regional and national conferences.on the mental health of lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals as well as the psychological experiences among people in same-sex couples.

Office: 707.644.3395
Email: julie.shulman@sonoma.edu

Labels: , , ,


Read article »

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Election 2008 - Sonoma County & the Nation



Well - one thing about the Obama-Biden ticket is that they want to build peace and prosperity from the bottom up. Trickle down economics never did work. So now we have a chance to see if bottom up not only creates a better economic climate for us all, but that having our basic needs on top of the priority list will create the comfort we all seek, and that translates to less anger - which translates to less violence. If all goes well, this will spread across the planet. Comfortable people are rarely angry enough to kill others. Motivated by ambition rather than anger. What a concept!

Now let's see how that translates to California politics - then to Sonoma County...


NATION - all of us who were optimistic that the Obama-Biden team could make it all the way to the White House have been proven correct. Manifesting the name President Barrack Obama worked - how very California! Congratulations to every person who volunteered to help make this happen. Now we have even more volunteering to do to make our agenda reality over the next decade. This is a team effort that will take years to accomplish.

There are plenty of opportunities. Please refer to the Volunteer section of my newspaper where every month there are ways you can become involved in our community and make changes happen every day toward a better world.

STATE - I'll keep checking the results until they are final and make any changes I see coming our way.

My high hopes for Equality & Justice for All - and I do mean all - from chickens in cages to lovers in churches and teenage girls with embryos developing in their bellies - have been dashed. This election is a bi-polar moment in history. Many of us feel elation and depression all at once.

On a county level - as you can see below - we seem to be on the same page. So we are safe at home. How very fine for us. On a state level - we have a lot of work to do. I believe our national constitution is about that wonderful concept of freedom of choice and equality and justice for all. How many times do we need to repeat the phrase to get people to understand that THIS is what our country stands for. You can't label people as exception to those rules. Our work is cut out for us as the saying goes. We need to challenge Prop 8 supporters on a Constituitional level.

SONOMA COUNTY - The corner of Hwy 116 and Hwy 12 in downtown Sebastopol has always been a place where people let their opinions be known with placards and waves to cars driving by. Some support Our Troops, others oppose war & violence. On election eve it was Efren vs. Rue, Prop 8 yes and no, Prop 2 yes - I saw no No. Kathleen Shaffer and her husband inspiring voters to support Kathleen.

What happens best of all at these gatherings is that opposing forces have a chance to spend time with each other. Communication is the key to changing minds. Let's keep talking. But as I like to say - it's not “I'm right - you're wrong” that works. We need to respect other's opinions and simplye xpress our own without making the other person wrong. They will listen if we approach subjects that way. Dialogue - not monologue.

You are always welcome to add your opinions. That's what this newspaper is all about. Whether on the web or in print - let me know what's on your minds at vesta@sonic.net.

Sonoma County Consolidated General Election
This is how WE voted - not that state or the nation - November 4, 2008

Election Results as of 11/05/2008 at 9:30pm

President and Vice President
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Displayed as Vote Count then Percentage (hard to translate this into this format)
Obama/Biden, Dem 144,399-73.5%
McCain/Palin, Rep 47,184-24.0%
Nader/Gonzalez, PF 1,633-0.8%
Barr/Root, Lib 1,065-0.5%
McKinney/Clemente, Grn 707-0.4%
Keyes/Drake, AIP 692-0.4%
Write-in candidate(s) 674-0.3%


U S Representative 1st District
Completed Precincts: 87 of 87
Vote Count-Percentage
Mike Thompson, Dem 20,581-68.6%
Zane Starkewolf, Rep 7,123-23.8%
Carol Wolman, Grn 2,237-7.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 46-0.2%


U S Representative 6th District
Completed Precincts: 366 of 366
Vote Count-Percentage
Lynn Woolsey, Dem 113,296-70.6%
Mike Halliwell, Rep 39,976-24.9%
Joel R Smolen, Lib 6,986-4.4%
Write-in candidate(s) 241-0.2%


State Senator 3rd District
Completed Precincts: 158 of 158
Vote Count-Percentage
Mark Leno, Dem 48,272 -1.2%
Sashi McEntee, Rep 19,475-28.7%
Write-in candidate(s) 94-0.1%


Member of Assembly 1st District
Completed Precincts: 133 of 133
Vote Count-Percentage
Wesley Chesbro, Dem 37,048-74.3%
Jim Pell, Rep 12,718-25.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 103-0.2%


Member of Assembly 6th District
Completed Precincts: 161 of 161
Vote Count-Percentage
Jared Huffman, Dem 46,362-66.0%
Paul Lavery, Rep 18,397-26.2%
Timothy J Hannan, Lib 5,221-7.4%
Write-in candidate(s) 237-0.3%


Member of Assembly 7th District
Completed Precincts: 159 of 159
Vote Count-Percentage
Noreen Evans, Dem 48,513-73.2%
Doris Gentry, Rep 17,629-26.6%
Write-in candidate(s) 99-0.1%


Sonoma County Board of Education Area 1
Completed Precincts: 78 of 78
Vote Count-Percentage
Alex Bantis 12,149-50.0%
John A Musilli 12,080-49.7%
Write-in candidate(s) 85-0.3%


So Co Jr College Dist Santa Rosa Area
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 157 of 157
Vote Count-Percentage
Richard W Call 36,369 -40.3%
Keith Woods 26,945-29.8%
Don Edgar 26,729-29.6%
Write-in candidate(s) 257-0.3%


Calistoga Joint Unified School District
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 3 of 3
Vote Count Percentage
Mary Burke Montez 137-28.4%
Marty Hunt 102-21.2%
Paul Schlieder 93-19.3%
Marco DiGiulio 86-17.8%
Michael Feiner 64-13.3%
Write-in candidate(s) 0-0.0%


Cloverdale Unified School District
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 8 of 8
Vote Count-Percentage
Karen J Scalabrini 2,513-29.0%
Dianna MacDonald 2,414-27.9%
Dick Johnson 1,965-22.7%
Daniel L Bunting 1,764-20.4%
Write-in candidate(s) 6-0.1%


Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 35 of 35
Vote Count-Percentage
Ed Gilardi 8,762-35.5%
Karyn Pulley 8,091-32.7%
Marc Orloff 7,776-31.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 86-0.3%


Windsor Unified School District
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 31 of 31
Vote Count-Percentage
George R Valenzuela 5,575-38.3%
Ted Seche 5,091-35.0%
Shari Kirichenko-Egan 3,876-26.6%
Write-in candidate(s) 23-0.2%


Bellevue Union School District
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 21 of 21
Vote Count-Percentage
Debra A Mills 2,03- 36.2%
Yvonne L Kennedy 1,790-31.9%
Katherine Holden 1,766-31.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 23-0.4%


Forestville Union School District
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 8 of 8
Vote Count-Percentage
Jean Bullard 1,634-37.4%
Ron Abler 1,372-31.4%
Guy Eck 1,348-30.9%
Write-in candidate(s) 15-0.3%


Liberty School District
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 2 of 2
Vote Count-Percentage
Geraldine T Johnston 578-43.6%
Ronald K Evenich 533-40.2%
Albert J Romano 209-15.8%
Write-in candidate(s) 5-0.4%


County Supervisor 1st District
Completed Precincts: 119 of 119
Vote Count Percentage
Valerie K Brown 20,891-51.2%
Will Pier 19,786-48.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 130-0.3%


County Supervisor 3rd District
Completed Precincts: 71 of 71
Vote Count Percentage
Shirlee Zane 17,318-55.3%
Sharon Wright 13,83- 44.2%
Write-in candidate(s) 166-0.5%


County Supervisor 5th District
Completed Precincts: 91 of 91
Vote Count-Percentage
Efren Carrillo 17,395-50.8%
Rue Furch 16,725-48.8%
Write-in candidate(s) 132-0.4%


Member, City Council Santa Rosa F/T
Vote For: 4
Completed Precincts: 107 of 107
Vote Count Percentage
Gary Wysocky 25,211 13.7%
John Sawyer 24,613 13.4%
Ernesto Olivares 22,990 12.5%
Marsha Vas Dupre 20,608 11.2%
Lee Pierce 19,266 10.5%
Don Taylor 18,383 10.0%
Michael Allen 16,406 8.9%
Bobbi Hoff 13,675 7.4%
Carol Dean 12,265 6.7%
Eddie Alvarez 6,468 3.5%
Hans Dippel 4,222 2.3%
Write-in candidate(s) 192 0.1%


Member, City Council Santa Rosa S/T
Completed Precincts: 107 of 107
Vote Count Percentage
Jane Bender 23,042 45.7%
Judy Kennedy 10,719 21.3%
David Rosas 9,659 19.2%
Lawrence R Wiesner 6,781 13.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 192 0.4%


Member, City Council Cloverdale F/T
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 5 of 5
Vote Count Percentage
Mary Ann Brigham 2,033 39.1%
Augustine Gus Wolter 1,641 31.6%
Luciano Toninato 1,513 29.1%
Write-in candidate(s) 6 0.1%


Member, City Council Cloverdale S/T
Completed Precincts: 5 of 5
Vote Count Percentage
Jessalee Raymond 2,497 98.0%
Write-in candidate(s) 50 2.0%


City Clerk Cloverdale
Completed Precincts: 5 of 5
Vote Count Percentage
Michele P Winterbottom 2,523 98.8%
Write-in candidate(s) 31 1.2%


Member, City Council Cotati
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 5 of 5
Vote Count Percentage
Janet Orchard 1,385 20.1%
Robert Coleman 1,363 19.7%
Mike Kurvers 1,153 16.7%
George Barich 1,129 16.4%
Susan Harvey 1,089 15.8%
Eric Kirchmann 773 11.2%
Write-in candidate(s) 10 0.1%


Member, City Council Healdsburg
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 8 of 8
Vote Count Percentage
Mike Mc Guire 3,939 35.7%
Tom Chambers 2,673 24.2%
Gary W Plass 2,571 23.3%
Tony Pastene 1,842 16.7%
Write-in candidate(s) 10 0.1%


Member, City Council Petaluma
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 38 of 38
Vote Count Percentage
David Glass 12,850 22.4%
Mike Healy 10,608 18.5%
Tiffany Renee 9,972 17.4%
Karen Nau 9,326 16.3%
Samantha Freitas 7,928 13.8%
Spence F Burton 6,521 11.4%
Write-in candidate(s) 49 0.1%


Member, City Council Rohnert Park
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 28 of 28
Vote Count Percentage
Gina Belforte 5,870 17.2%
Jake Mackenzie 5,248 15.4%
Joseph T Callinan 5,242 15.4%
John Borba 5,085 14.9%
Tim Smith 4,533 13.3%
Vicki Vidak-Martinez 4,085 12.0%
Dawna Gallagher 3,923 11.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 62 0.2%


Member, City Council Sebastopol
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 6 of 6
Vote Count Percentage
Guy Wilson 2,091 35.5%
Kathleen Shaffer 2,089 35.5%
JenThille 1,341 22.8%
Colleen Fernald 355 6.0%
Write-in candidate(s) 10 0.2%


Member, Town Council Windsor
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 22 of 22
Vote Count Percentage
Debora Fudge 5,719 36.8%
Cheryl Scholar 4,188 27.0%
Julie Adamson 2,804 18.1%
Leroy Dysart 2,796 18.0%
Write-in candidate(s) 19 0.1%


Rincon Valley Fire Protection Dist
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 59 of 59
Vote Count Percentage
Patricia P Waldow 5,491 28.7%
Darrel J Mead 5,486 28.6%
James M Bouler 4,796 25.0%
John Hamann 3,361 17.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 31 0.2%


Valley of the Moon Fire Protection Dist
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 18 of 18
Vote Count Percentage
Dawn Mittleman 4,459 29.6%
William Norton 4,340 28.8%
Ray Brunton 3,974 26.4%
Elissa Wadleigh 2,251 14.9%
Write-in candidate(s) 36 0.2%


Windsor Fire Protection Dist
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 26 of 26
Vote Count Percentage
Victor Pozzi 4,402 23.3%
John D Nelson 4,109 21.8%
Adam Joseph Brolan 3,834 20.3%
Richard Olufs 3,751 19.9%
Myron Steele 2,768 14.7%
Write-in candidate(s) 27 0.1%


Petaluma Health Care District
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 62 of 62
Vote Count Percentage
Fran Adams 13,876 22.1%
Stephen Steady 12,205 19.5%
Robert Ostroff 10,605 16.9%
Liz Close 9,712 15.5%
Robert C Hill 8,267 13.2%
Gerald S Besses 8,006 12.8%
Write-in candidate(s) 77 0.1%


Sonoma Valley Health Care District
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 42 of 42
Vote Count Percentage
Peter Hohorst 8,275 30.4%
Madolyn Agrimonti 6,428 23.6%
Bill Boerum 6,341 23.3%
Bill Gurry 6,124 22.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 77 0.3%


PROP 1A - Safe, Reliable Passenger Train Bond Act
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 120,662 63.9%
No 68,229 36.1%


PROP 2 - Standards For Confining Farm Animals
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 120,231 63.2%
No 70,157 36.8%


PROP 3 - Children's Hospital Bond Act
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 88,335 47.9%
No 96,168 52.1%


PROP 4 - Waiting Period Term Minor's Pregnancy
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 63,319 33.5%
No 125,953 66.5%


PROP 5 - Nonviolent Drug Offenses. Sentencing
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 81,365 43.6%
No 105,440 56.4%


PROP 6 - Funds For Law Enforcement. Penalties
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 41,247 22.6%
No 141,195 77.4%


PROP 7 - Renewable Energy Generation
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 60,001 32.1%
No 126,916 67.9%


PROP 8 - Eliminate Right of Same-Sex Couples
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 65,898 33.9%
No 128,466 66.1%


PROP 9 -Criminal Justice Victims' Rights. Parole
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 82,392 45.8%
No 97,400 54.2%


PROP 10 - Alternative Fuel Vehicles. Bonds
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 62,726 34.4%
No 119,858 65.6%


PROP 11 - Redistricting Constitutional Amendment
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 92,428 53.0%
No 81,975 47.0%


PROP 12 - Veterans' Bond Act of 2008
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 118,808 66.0%
No 61,319 34.0%


Measure J - Bellevue Union School Dist. Bonds
Completed Precincts: 21 of 21
Vote Count Percentage
Bonds Yes 2,892 68.8%
Bonds No 1,312 31.2%


Measure K - Petaluma Reduce Wastewater Rates
Completed Precincts: 38 of 38
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 10,519 45.8%
No 12,468 54.2%


Measure L - Rohnert Park Reduce Sewer Rates
Completed Precincts: 28 of 28
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 7,269 52.9%
No 6,485 47.1%


Measure M - Sebastopol Utility Users Tax
Completed Precincts: 6 of 6
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 2,155 59.4%
No 1,471 40.6%


Measure N - Windsor Transient Occupancy Tax
Completed Precincts: 22 of 22
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 6,827 70.2%
No 2,896 29.8%


Measure O - Gold Ridge Fire District Parcel Tax
Completed Precincts: 21 of 21
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 5,814 75.7%
No 1,867 24.3%


Measure P - Sonoma Vly Health Care Dist Bond
Completed Precincts: 42 of 42
Vote Count Percentage
Bonds Yes 13,021 80.8%
Bonds No 3,093 19.2%


Measure Q - SMART Rail Quarter Cent Sales Tax
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 138,624 73.5%
No 50,047 26.5%


Registration and Turnout Total
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Reg/Turnout Percentage
Total Registered Voters 248,122
Precinct Registration 248,122
Precinct Ballots Cast 87,167 35.1%
Absentee Ballots Cast 110,657 44.6%
Total Ballots Cast 197,824 79.7%

For more information and updates:
http://www.sonoma-county.org/regvoter/elections/Results/results.asp


Labels: , , ,


Read article »

Monday, November 3, 2008

MORE Election Letters for Sonoma County Races


We're getting down to the wire - and even though many people have already voted - there's still plenty of discussion going around. This batch of letters is about the 5th District Supervisor race between Efren Carillo and Rue Furch (more!) and also about the Sebastopol City Council race.


Dear Community,

Please see the PD story below and tell me, what does having a "low carbon campaign" (no signs spoiling our view, or loads of printed material crammed in your mail box) have to do with my view of accountable development for the North East Area Plan?

Please share your views with a letter to the Editor of the Press Democrat (to paul.gullixson@pressdemocrat.com), Wacco, and any other form of community communication you feel appropriate.

What does "Sustainable Sebastopol" mean to you? Do you think the community group that once existed has been shanghaied for select political/development gain? What would you like that group to be now?

One thing that is clear, I will be elected, or I won't; I'm fine with either outcome; but it is the town itself that will win, or not, depending on what 2 candidates are chosen.

Elected, or not, I will continue to work with the cities in the county, the County of Sonoma, and the community to evolve what sustainability looks like for us.

I will remain committed to work towards legislating an end to the unconstitutional use of force the US is involved in. This is way beyond the obvious ethical and true national security reasons; we need our tax dollars to be used for our own country for all the pressing social and environmental challenges at stake, as well as the practical things like paving our roads.

I won't tell you how to vote; whether it's the 1 or 2 person strategy, or even which candidate. I will just suggest that you don't fall for a false shade of "green", that you probe both your heart and your head and vote for what is in Sebastopol's short and long term best interest.

In peace,
Colleen Fernald
Candidate for Sebastopol City Council
colleenfernald@earthlink.net
707.829.2243



'Bullet' voting could hit council races
By BLEYS W. ROSE
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Published: Thursday, October 23, 2008 at 11:39 a.m.

While slate advertising for like-minded city council candidates is all the rage at the moment, there's another theory called "bullet voting" that advocates say ensures your top choices get into office.

Proponents of voting by "bullet" say casting a ballot for only your top choice means everybody's second choice won't skate in and possibly knock off your pick.

Bullet voting comes into play in multiple candidate fields, including council elections in Santa Rosa, Petaluma, Rohnert Park, Windsor, Healdsburg and Sebastopol where candidates in the philosophical center stand a good chance of getting elected by virtue of being popular second choices.

Here's how it could work in Sebastopol, where savvy experts are chatting up bullet voting as the only way to make sure their candidates get elected to the two open city council seats:

Jen Thille is viewed as the candidate most in favor of the city's Northeast Area Specific Plan; Guy Wilson as the most opposed and Kathleen Shaffer as somewhere in between. (A fourth candidate, Colleen Fernald, has demonstrated little evidence of financing, yard signs and literature, so she's not been a factor in this calculation.)

If voters inclined toward the northeast plan use both their votes, then Thille and Shaffer are their likely choices. Those opposed to the northeast plan would pick Wilson and Shaffer. Thus, Shaffer seems likely to benefit when voters exercise their right to make choices on the two open seats.

Which leaves Wilson and Thille fighting for second place - unless voters opt to use only one vote for their top choice.

Watch for literature prompting single-candidate, bullet-style voting coming to a city near you.


---------------------------------------


!!VOTE FOR EFREN CARRILLO!!!

Thank God...36 hours to go and one of the nastiest elections in the Fifth District is over.

It's unfortunate the union bosses ($125,000 against Efren) and dark business interests ($55,000 against Rue) hijacked the election from two fine candidates, while stuffing our mailboxes with crap. Of note is neither candidate disavowed the "Independent Expenditure" monies directed at the other. I believe members of each campaign were closely involved with these efforts...there should be laws preventing individuals and organizations from donating $20,000-$120,000 spewing lies and distortions against other candidates.

Whoever wins will not escape my ire with what I feel we need to do working together toward a sustainable future. I believe we are close to a collapse of many of our institutions, and thus far I do not see the courage and resolve needed towards necessary reforms and changes. If I ever run for office again I will probably begin my stump speech with,"...after the collapse this is what we need to do in order to have a phoenix rise from the ashes..." Why is our political discourse so shy and timid to avoid addressing real solutions?

If in my zeal to save the world I have offended any of my friends, please accept my humble apology. If not...c'est la vie...such is life...

Peace and Love to ALL!!
Tom Lynch


Labels: ,


Read article »

Friday, October 31, 2008

LETTERS - Sonoma County Politics


More letters keep coming in about the upcoming election. I will get every one up until the end of voting - then we will move back to our life as we know it - with a whole new collection of people in charge.

I'd like to extend appreciation to everyone who dares run for public office considering how they have to expose their personal lives to so much scrutiny. They are very brave people to be willing to be so vulnerable in order to govern - jobs that most of us wouldn't want to do - and certainly most of us would not be willing to have people know so much and criticize so thoroughly, how we run our lives.

I also want to say how much I appreciate how involved our electorate (us) is this election cycle. People really care and we have the freedom to express our opinions. We are blessed on both counts. Voting is privilege as much as a right - please VOTE!

"This is huge. This is bigger than life itself. When I was coming up, I always thought they put in who they wanted to put in. I didn't think my vote mattered. But I don't think that anymore."
- DEDDRICK BATTLE, who at age 55 registered to vote for the first time.

Read on…


Editor:

Rue Furch, in our view, is the most experienced, most prepared, and the only candidate who understands the complexity of county government, in the race for 5th District Supervisor. We are very confident that she will to listen to our issues, be open to our opinions and be willing and able to champion our causes when she is elected to the Board of Supervisors. There is a great deal at stake in this race for the future of Sonoma County. We need a leader who can listen to both sides, ascertain what the real issues are and can act and vote accordingly. We have watched Rue at the Planning Commission and know first hand that she asks the right questions and makes good decisions based on the answers. Rue has the knowledge required and the ability to work with the board in a collaborative manner. With respect to the environment, water and land use, Rue is the candidate best equipped to tackle these issues. At the same time, she will be a voice for working people and those of us fighting for human (including immigrant) rights. We are honored to strongly recommend Rue Furch for Fifth District Supervisor.

Casimiro Alvarez, United Farm Workers
Caroline Bañuelos, Sonoma County Latino Democratic Club
Raquel Gomez, Committee for Immigrant Rights

-----------------------------

Dear Editor:

During my 27 years as a resident of San Diego County, I witnessed local politicians - backed by developers - disregard the environment and bring progressive deterioration to the area's natural tranquil beauty, air quality, traffic flow, public safety, and economy. I do not want to see Sonoma County make similar mistakes. Each candidate for 5th District Supervisor would lead in a different direction: Ms. Rue Furch cares and values the unique cultural and natural diversity within Sonoma County. She has been committed to researching and discussing the issues for many years giving her the wisdom, insight, vision and professional network to quickly and effectively deal with current and future challenges. Her "knowledge of county development and planning issues is encyclopedic" (Press Democrat 9/24/08), because she has the perseverance and self-discipline to continue to educate herself and others.

I attended Graton's debate on Wednesday, October 8th with an open mind. During the debate, Ms. Furch questioned Mr. Efren Carillo on pertinent West County issues, he responded with trite political speeches never answering the original questions. He demonstrated an obvious lack of basic knowledge on such concepts as monitoring well-water usage. When asked about the drainage problems faced by current homeowners due to new development, Mr. Carillo laughed and started to make a joke then launched into another vapid political monologue. When asked his opinion on Measure Q - he asked the audience what Measure Q was. Mr. Carillo is like the student who does not bother to do their homework then talks a lot as a tactic to fool others. He does not seem overly concerned or aware that he lacks a vast amount of crucial information and maturity in order to shoulder the responsibilities and make major long-lasting decisions affecting each resident, especially land and property owners.

Mr. Carillo directed personally accusatory questions toward Ms. Furch, who calmly responded showing that his information was incorrect. Mr. Carillo spoke proudly of his work ethic, values and ability to work well with others, saying: "Everyone has a place at the table." However, while sitting at the same table less than three feet away from Ms. Furch, Mr. Carillo became agitated and accused her of lying. His closing statement was an angry tirade directed at Ms. Furch. Do we really need a County Supervisor who is disrespectful and unable to control his emotions? Verbally attacks those with whom he disagrees? Does not diligently study and understand how the county works? Do you want Sonoma County to look like Southern California? I hope not!

Ms. Rue Furch has the wisdom, education, experience, integrity and strong work ethic to be our next and very successful 5th District Sonoma County Supervisor. Please remember to vote intelligently and remind others to do so also! Thank you.

Sincerely,

Larysa Tanya Shmorhay
Sebastopol, CA
---------------------------------------

During close to 15 years of advocating for Roseland at hundreds, and hundreds, of public meetings throughout Sonoma County I have NEVER seen Efren Carillo participate.

As a matter of fact I never heard of him, until a couple of years ago when I was told he had graduated from UC Berkeley.

Because I have also, I contacted him, first by email and then in person. He only responded by sending me emails for the Joe Nation political campaign.

When I met him and his girlfriend, he said he would get in contact with me about Roseland.

He shined me on.

At a recent meeting of the Santa Rosa City Council about the Parks plan he came but did not speak.

He left early before the Roseland advocates were able to speak to the issues of our underserved area.

I believe he is interested in being a well paid politician.

I do NOT believe he is interested in helping Roseland, or working to solve our environmental issues such as brownfields.

His actions speak louder than his words. He has done NOTHING for Roseland in 15 years.

Please do not vote for him yet, wait until actions prove his intentions. Talk is cheap.

Please vote for Rue Furch for County Supervisor in the Fifth District. She has consistently worked to help Roseland try to protect green open spaces for parks instead of development. also she has helped us in Roseland Creek Cleanups. She tries to help our disadvantaged neighborhood in spite of politics.

She walks the talk. Vote for her for a better Sonoma County and we will al be better off.

Sincerely,
Duane De Witt
Santa Rosa, Ca. 95402

Labels: ,


Read article »

Sonoma County Conservation Action Endorsements


Greetings Friends of Sonoma County Conservation Action and the
Know Your Neighbor Program!


5 days til the November 4th election and we've got activities which beg for you to volunteer from Friday (Halloween) to Tuesday (Election Day), even if you just have 1 hour of your life to give. If you haven't gotten the message loud and clear yet, here it is: WE REALLY NEED YOUR HELP! LET'S WIN MEASURE Q AND GET PROGRESSIVE MAJORITIES ON OUR CITY COUNCILS AND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. Really, we're almost there. These races are so close and need your volunteer effort to win.

Following are endorsements and election activities for you to plug into. There are lots of ways to volunteer and many times to choose from. Whatever your availability is, we'll find a way to plug you in! Call me (Jenna Brager) now: 707-571-8868. And to those of you already helping, THANK YOU a million times over!

ELECTION ENDORSEMENTS:
County Supervisor
Will Pier - 1st District
Shirlee Zane - 3rd District
Rue Furch - 5th District

Santa Rosa
Michael Allen
Marsha Vas Dupre
Gary Wysocky
David Rosas (2 year seat)

Petaluma
Tiffany Renee
David Glass
NO on K - Water Rates Rollback

Windsor
Debora Fudge
Cheryl Scholar

Cotati
Janet Orchard
Mike Kurvers
Robert Coleman

Rohnert Park
Jake Mackenzie
Tim Smith
Vicki Vidak-Martinez
NO on L - Sewer Rates Rollback

Healdsburg
Mike McGuire
Tony Pastene

Sebastopol
Kathleen Shaffer
Jennifer Thille
Guy Wilson

YES ON Q - SMART Train and Pathway
YES ON 1A - High Speed Rail
YES ON 2 - Stop Animal Cruelty


ELECTION VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES:

Friday, Oct 31 (Halloween)
RUE FURCH PHONEBANK, 11am-2pm, Rue's Barn: 1430 High School Rd, Sebastopol

Saturday, Nov 1
RUE FURCH PHONEBANK, 10am-1pm, 496 South Main St, Sebastopol
DOORHANGERS, 1st and 3rd District, SANTA ROSA, 2:30-6:30pm, SCCA: 540 Pacific Ave, Santa Rosa
YES ON Q PHONEBANK, 10:30am-2pm, 120 Pleasant Hill Ave North, Ste 200, Sebastopol

Sunday, Nov 2
RUE FURCH PHONEBANK, noon-3pm, 496 South Main St, Sebastopol
SCCA MEMBERS Get Out the Vote PHONEBANK, 4pm-8pm, 7423 Shaun Ct, Sebastopol
DOORHANGERS, 1st and 3rd District, SANTA ROSA, 10am-1pm, SCCA: 540 Pacific Ave, Santa Rosa
YES ON Q PHONEBANK, 10:30am-2:30pm, 120 Pleasant Hill Ave, Ste 200, Sebastopol

Monday, Nov 3
SCCA MEMBERS Get Out the Vote PHONEBANK, 11am-8pm, SCCA: 540 Pacific Ave, Santa Rosa
DOORHANGERS, 1st and 3rd District, SANTA ROSA, 10am-3pm, SCCA: 540 Pacific Ave, Santa Rosa
RUE FURCH Get Out the Vote PHONEBANK, 11:30am-5pm, 496 South Main St, Sebastopol
YES ON Q PHONEBANK, 5:30pm-8:30pm, 120 Pleasant Hill Ave, Sebastopol

Tues, Nov 4 - Election Day!
MASSIVE GET OUT THE VOTE EFFORT, 7am-8pm, SCCA: 540 Pacific Ave, Santa Rosa


WHERE TO PARTY ON ELECTION NIGHT:
Sonoma County Democratic Party's
Election Night Victory Celebration
November 4th, 2008
Grand Ballroom, Flamingo Hotel
2777 4th St, Santa Rosa
8pm onward

Live Music by the Thugz
Free hors d'oeuvres
No-host bar
Large screen broadcast of election coverage
No cover charge, donations welcome
Questions? Contact (707) 575-3029
http://www.sonomademocrats.org/


Jenna Brager
Know Your Neighbor (KYN) Program
Sonoma County Conservation Action
jenna@conservationaction.org
707-571-8868
www.conservationaction.org


Labels:


Read article »

Thursday, October 30, 2008

NORA Proposition 5 Drug Treatment for Youth and Adults

As the Executive Director of the Drug Abuse Alternatives Center (DAAC), the largest provider of publicly funded alcohol and other drug treatment in Sonoma County, I have seen both the positives and negatives of Proposition 36, the precursor to Proposition 5. Overall, in my opinion, Prop. 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000, has been a success in Sonoma County and the State as a whole.


Ironically, I, along with many other treatment professionals, opposed Prop. 36 before it was passed. We were concerned that it had been written by outsiders who did not consult with California’s treatment providers and that it did not have strong enough sanctions for non-compliance with treatment, a key argument today by those who oppose Prop. 5.

In fact, I, and many others, turned out to be wrong. In Sonoma County, thousands of individuals have benefited from treatment instead of incarceration and our Public Safety has not been compromised. Statewide, 200,000 have received treatment and UCLA’s study of Prop. 36 not only showed that treatment has worked, but also that it has saved California over $2 Billion since 2000. The only negatives I have seen are that Prop. 36 has been under-funded which has caused long treatment waits and that no provision was made for treatment for youth.

Prop. 5 will improve on Prop. 36 by:


• Providing a systematic treatment system for adults that will unify the current system of Diversion, Prop. 36 Treatment and Drug Courts into one system with three tracks. Track 3, Drug Court, will not be eliminated, as some have said, but will, in fact, be funded at twice the level it is now.

• Providing $65 Million state-wide for funding of treatment for adolescents which will meet the spectrum of youth needs including family therapy, educational and employment stipends, mental health interventions and much more. Prop. 5 will provide services to youth before they get into trouble with the law.

Prop. 5 will do all this without compromising public safety. Judges, not the offender, will determine whether to send the individual to treatment or to jail. Offenders convicted of serious and violent crimes and sex offences will not be eligible.

Prop. 5 will also reform the prison and parole systems. Currently California spends $46,000 per year to house each inmate (twice the national average) and yet our recidivism rate is almost 70%, while nation-wide recidivism is about 35%. By reducing the number of parolees who are returned to prison for dirty urinalysis tests and allowing them to receive treatment, Parole Agents will be able to concentrate their efforts on supervising parolees who were originally incarcerated for serious and violent crimes.

Prop. 5 will do all this with no new taxes and save the State an estimated $2.5 Billion in its first few years according to the impartial and non-partisan Legislative Analysts Office. Our current system is clearly not working. Please join me, the League of Women Voters, the California NAACP and many other organizations and individuals in voting yes on Proposition 5.

Michael Spielman, MFT
Executive Director
Drug Abuse Alternatives Center
2380 Professional Drive, Santa Rosa
(707) 571-2233 x 308

Labels: , , ,


Read article »

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Sonoma County 5th District Supervisor Race



As this tight race heats up, it's taking on some of the personality of the national presidential race - which is unfortunate in some respects. When did politics become more about accusations than about people wanting to serve the public? Our letters are currently focused on candidate promotions slinging mud - who is doing what to whom, individuals' past actions - prediction on future actions, etc. When judging a political mail piece, please take notice of what organization generated the material. These are not all candidate approved. - V

EDITOR:
A recent campaign mailer from Efren Carrillo, who is running against Rue Furch for County Supervisor from the 5th District, makes the point that because Rue Furch got a loan from a real estate developer, she is therefore a pawn of real estate developers in Sonoma County, and that’s the point I wish to address here.

It’s a fact that Rue got a loan from a developer; no one disputes that, nor the fact that she refinanced that loan as soon as she discovered the identity of the lender. The question is what does that really mean? If it’s supposed to prove that Rue is under the influence of the big real estate developers of Sonoma County, there is a very good place to look for evidence of that influence, and that is her voting record after 16 years on the Sonoma County Planning Commission. I challenge anyone to find that Rue voted for a big developer and against the environment on any project that came before her on the Planning Commission. Her voting record is irrefutable proof that she is not in the pockets of big real estate development interests in Sonoma County.

Contrast her record with the record of her opponent, the candidate who put out this hit-piece. If, as Efren implies, financial support is evidence of influence, where is the record that will reassure us that despite the tens of thousands of dollars in contributions flowing into his campaign from real-estate developers and other big business-advocacy groups, he will vote to preserve West County? He has no voting record at all that we can look at, and there, my friends, is the problem. Efren keeps saying that he “will listen,” but money talks, and when big money talks, that’s who Efren will listen to.

Alice Chan
Sebastopol

---------------------------
To all: For those of you following the 5th district race, it's now been revealed where the push polling campaign that favored Efren Carrillo was coming from. SURPRISE! The local Sheriff dept. union had to disclose that they spent $7,500 on this supposedly neutral phone polling. Several of us had been wondering who was behind it as anyone paying attention could tell
it was slanted to favor Carrillo. It's no secret that law enforcement is solidly behind Efren even though he loves to portray himself as just another grateful and concerned community member. Carrillo talks a lot about "bringing everyone together" which sounds inspiring and all that. I'd like to say to him that you can't bring people together until you deal with the serious issues that are keeping them apart. His hurtful response last Sat. to Rick was very revealing when we are trying to figure out who actually has the community's best interests in mind. Follow the money and know who the backers are of both candidates.

Mary Moore
Monte Rio

Labels: ,


Read article »

Thursday, October 16, 2008

VOTING 2008

Beyond Gender, Race, and Ethnic Origin

I published my opinions on candidates and issues in the October 16th edition of the West County Gazette because people ask me my opinion - then tell me I actually have influence on readers. OK, the if I do - here foes. Here's how I'm voting on issues I have studied so far. I still have a long way to go on the propositions of which I am short on knowledge. So much to learn. So important to vote intelligently. Our world is in flux an that's a very good thing.

VOTING 2008
Beyond Gender, Race, and Ethnic Origin
By Vesta Copestakes

My Voter’s Pamphlet and mail-in ballot sit on my kitchen table, waiting for me to make intelligent decisions – yes or no. In some cases it’s quite obvious to me because I tend to vote with my value system. In others, I need to know more and delve into the text, read the pros and cons, and if I feel qualified to make a sound decision, I mark my ballot. If I feel too ignorant on any subject, I leave it blank.

I won’t vote by gender for a woman just because I’m female and she’s female. She needs to be intelligent, calm, thoughtful, considerate and knowledgeable about the position for which she is running.

I won’t vote for a black or oriental or Indian person just because I want to see more faces among my government officials in charge who truly represent our population. It’s my preference, but that person is more than a person of color or race, s/he is the person I trust with decisions over matters that I know nothing.

I won’t vote for an ethic minority or gay/lesbian person for the same reasons as females and race. Yes, I’d love to see people who have suffered under the prejudices of white male rule come forward and represent their communities. But whoever is running needs to earn my respect and stand above me and the rest of us as qualified for the position.

That means I can’t make easy decisions – like I’ll vote for her or him just to even out the gender/race/ethnic, etc. balance in our government. Over time, I am seeing that balance come about. Some things just take many years to accomplish and I’m a patient person. An unqualified person who fails or blunders does no one any good.

My Ballot – so far:

President/Vice president – Obama/Biden.
This is an easy choice for me. These are two very intelligent and strong individuals who remain calm in the face of drama, who take the time to think things through carefully and who have my basic values in their hearts. I watch them with awe and respect. That’s what I want in the leaders of my country. People far superior to me.

U.S. Representative - Lynn Woolsey. If nothing else I admire her right-thinking around the Iraq war and her persistence in working toward goals I find commendable. There have been instances when I don’t agree with her, but what else is new. The majority of the time I feel well-represented by a person who gets things done.

Farm Animals – I’ve never been able to cage an animal. This is a heart issue for me – not an economic one. If I were that animal, how would I feel confined to a small space. Miserable and helpless. No being deserves to feel that way and we as humans have no right to do that to innocents.

Parental Notification – this is so wrong it hurts. It makes girls victims once more. Boys run free, girls pay the price. Many girls cannot talk freely with their parents. They will run away, find illegal abortions, hurt themselves – you name it. So many girls will pay too high a price if this passes.

Non-Violent Offenders – this is economically as well as socially important. People fall victim under the influence of drugs and alcohol and make mistakes. These are not violent people. They are people who need help. Throwing them in jail costs way too much money and does them – and society no good.

Matrimony for Same-Sex Couples – of course. What right have we to tell people who love each other that they can’t have the same benefits of marriage as the rest of us. How very wrong to deny them both the legal and emotional bonds of matrimony. This is a discrimination law and is not to be tolerated.

5th District Supervisor this is my district and like so many – I find Efren Carillo a very nice man, but I’m voting for Rue Furch. I have watched her for years at Planning Commission meetings and seen how her phenomenal knowledge about the infinite details on subjects have allowed her to educate her opponents, and therefore change their minds with information. Too many officials vote without these details. She consistently amazes me and has my support.

3rd District Supervisor – not my district but I am supporting Shirlee Zane. In many ways this is a vote against Sharon Wright. She is far more pro-growth than I see as healthy for this county. I’ve watched her for decades and she has never reflected my values.

SMART Train – this is a long-term benefit project and some times we just have to think that far into the future. I want to see this work. I come from the East Coast where trains like this are a matter of life and have been for many decades. It’s time we had one here. Once we have it, people will use it. It’s simply a smart alternative to commuting by car.

I have more studying to do before I fill out my ballot. But I can tell you that spending money is not high on my list. Why am I even telling you my opinion? Because people tell me I have influence, and it’s time to use it. I love my home, my country and my environment – and yes – they are all mine to take care of in ways that I consider prudent. Readers know my favorite phrase – we are all in this together. It is our mutual responsibility to VOTE wisely and with our hearts as well as our minds. Thanks for reading.

Labels: , , ,


Read article »

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Letters to the Editor on politics, community & envirnoment



I'm grateful for this web site, especially right now when I counted the current collection of letters to go into the October print edition of WCG. Nearly 6,000 words right here - plus the previous collection of letters. Having WCG be the Voice of the Communities of West Sonoma County takes up a lot of room! Thank you every person who takes the time to put your opinions on paper to share with our readers. - V

---------------
What kinds of people are from Sonoma? There were ten local Sonoma Old boys at the R Bar in San Francisco last Saturday night who Beat the @#$% out of my husband and cousin for no reason at all. These losers hit and kicked my husband breaking his nose and then running from the scene. The one in the red/black checked shirt with a green hat is getting married in one of your local churches this weekend and would love to get a message to him that we will find him, marriage license records are easy to come by. I have contacted the San Francisco Police Department and we will be settling damages in court!!! I will also be contacting all local churches of this disgusting behavior. Just thought I'd let your local Newspaper know what thugs are coming down to S.F. and causing problems. Stay in your side of the bridge!!
Bernadette Quigley
San Francisco

Aside from feeling compassion toward you, your husband and cousin – this makes me seriously concerned for the bride who is about to marry an abusive person. Straight or drunk, there is no excuse for abuse – on any level. I rather hope this incident is enough to make the bride call off the wedding. Love does not conquer all. - V

----------------------------
Vote, Again and Again
If you happen to have read the Press Democrat last week, Efren Carrillo placed a very expensive 16 page campaign insert inside next to the Sports section. I discovered that two companies whose products I purchase and thought represented local, sustainable practices endorsed a candidate that has the major support of pro-growth industries and individuals. The companies are Taylor Maid and Traditional Medicinals. I am surprised and dismayed with this.

I am going to assume that TMaid’s head, Mark Inman, and Tmedicinal’s head, Drake Sadler, are not naïve; that they know Efren has financial support from development and large ag industries and know these interests don’t financially support a candidate and then just leave them alone. I assume they know that those industries and their lobbyists are present at the Supervisor’s meetings, Planning Commission meetings, and Board of Zoning Adjustment’s meetings as well as private meetings. Therefore, it is likely that Inman and Sadler are aware of the undue political influence of big money and have accepted this.

This is counter to the Sonoma County I see in the future. The other candidate, Rue Furch, has kept her distance from undue influence from industry by not accepting large amounts of money from them in the first place. A once local, progressive politician answered the question, “How did big industry get to you?”, by answering, “Propinquity” (proximity). That’s what can happen and we see it time and again. Who else but industry “consultants” are being paid to sit at those meetings day in and day out to influence the outcome? Instead, we have a unique opportunity in this election to elect someone in Rue Furch who you not only can go to but will likely come to you, even if you didn’t dole out thousands of dollars in her campaign. The question that it comes down to is, who will my supervisor really represent?

For me, at this point, I cannot wait to vote for Rue Furch, who will represent the interests of the public on concerns about the sustainability of our environment and our quality of life. In the meantime, I will vote another way today. That’s right. Cesar Chavez said that every time you make a purchase, you are voting. You vote with your dollars and it is a vote that counts every time. Today I vote to buy coffee from Ecco or Thanksgiving and tea from Guayaki or Celestial Seasonings. Why wait? Go vote today and every day for what you want your world to be and look like. You know it will count.
Larry Hanson

--------------------
Dear Editor,
October 8th was International Walk and Roll to School Day, and 32 schools in Sonoma County participated in the event. But none had to take such extraordinary safety measures as the schools on Watertrough Road in the Twin Hills School District, west of Sebastopol. Ours was probably the most dangerous route, especially the section heading out of town on Bodega Hwy, where traffic moves fast, there is no shoulder, and a big curve limits visibility. That over 86 walkers and 35 bicyclists made the harrowing route of less than one mile that morning shows how strongly the community needs this route improved. Participants were from Sunridge Waldorf Charter School, Apple Blossom, Twin Hills, Tree House Hollow Preschool, and Willow Spring School.

Big thanks go out to the Sheriffs department, the Sebastopol Police Department, and the CHP for being on the scene slowing traffic. Also kudos to Sebastopol Mayor Craig Litwin and family, and Supervior candidate Rue Furch for joining our walking bus. While the various jurisdictions who oversee this stretch of road, figure out how to fund improvements, a handful of kids and bike commuters are out there every day, at risk, without the police and parent protectors waving signs and holding caution tape. I hope community actions like this can prevent a tragedy and inspire road engineers to get in gear. The old fashioned mom and pop barn-raising sidewalk making committee like the one who organized this event without the Safe Routes to Schools grant money, will continue to trail blaze with monthly Wednesday walks, and asks the community to be aware on the road and join the cause. Studies have shown that exercise before school boosts learning and test scores. And it was just plain fun.
Our group can be reached at WSASRS@yahoogroups.com
Laura Shafer
Sebastopol

----------------------
Vesta ,
Obviously I have too much time on my hands....
I have the answer to our country's problems! We re elect the thugs that run our country!
The poor will get poorer and the rich will get richer after all the alternative is socialism.
Use all our natural resources as fast as possible. After its all said and done- we can hitch up the indigent and homeless to the dead gas guzzlers for transportation, use the rest of the poor and sick ( no health care) in the fields to grow food . We ( the rich )will have plenty of workers because we will out law birth control and any related education. Oh yes we will all be vegetarians because our oceans will be a polluted cesspool from oil spills and garbage dumping.
After all saving the environment will not be PROFITABLE AND MOTIVATED BY SOCIALISTS.
YOUR LIBERAL FRIEND
Larry Conover

-------------------
Thanks, Vesta, for putting my story on the front page and for getting such colorful photos, which certainly add to the story. I have already been getting positive comments, including from people yesterday at Quicksilver's opening. I am glad to see copies around Sebastopol here.
Shepherd Bliss

Glad you like it - It's up on the web site as well - I have numerous stands in Sebastopol so beyond the mailings - the paper gets a pretty broad audience there. It amazes me how many Sebastopol readers I have since most have to go out to get a copy. But I have to fill my newsstands two - sometimes three times a month. - V

-----------------
To the Editor:
After a great deal of thought I have decided to support Rue Furch for Fifth District Supervisor. We are all familiar with Rue’s environmental credentials. In addition, I have had in-depth discussions with Rue about the county’s financial situation and am now convinced that she both understands it and is prepared to take the necessary actions to fix the problems.

But that is only part of the reason for my decision. It is not only important that Rue wins, it is important that the people behind Efren Carrillo be taught that they cannot sell us a Trojan horse. Efren is an intelligent, charming, and articulate young man. But his support comes primarily from the coalition of large home developers, gravel miners, and corporate agriculture that has, for decades, demonstrated their willingness to put their own economic gain above of the good of the county as a whole. The idea that an inexperienced 27 year old could accept more than $100,000 in support of these interests and then not be beholden to them after he is in office is just too much of a stretch to accept. Electing Efren would be like asking the fox to guard the henhouse.

Some of my supporters, disappointed in the outcome of the primary, have told me they would either write my name in or refrain from voting in the supervisor election. I ask them, please not to do either. The stakes are too high to allow for symbolic gestures. Vote for Rue Furch for 5th District Supervisor.
Jim Maresca
Guerneville

-----------------------

An Open Letter to Lloyd Guccione
Dear Lloyd,
I have owned property in Villa Grande for seven years. As I came to know the area I would read the papers, talk to my neighbors, attend community functions. Your name would come up time and again; my curiosity would be piqued, and people would roll their eyes and say "Oh, its just Lloyd being Lloyd!"

Listening to you speak at meetings may have been entertaining at first, but so is listening to Rush Limbaugh. You speak down to elected representatives in a patronizing manner that is as irritating and irrelevant as the content of your words. Worse, you take up an inordinate amount of staff time with requests for documents. Worse still, your lawsuits having to do with government transparency and the Brown Act have taken $70,000 out of budgets for the work of RRROC. You, more than any other factor, have caused the county to rein in the power of the RRROC, as enunciated by Mike Reilly and board members I have spoken with.

In Monte Rio I have been active with a group of ordinary citizens for almost a year trying to work out a solution for the septic and sewer issues that face our community. We got the Monte Rio Park and Recreation Department to sponsor the creation of a subcommittee to try to involve community input and eventually get a grant for a request for proposal for septic and sewer solutions. Lloyd, your participation was limited to sniping from the sidelines with requests for documents and not so veiled threats of one of your patented Brown Act lawsuits. Park and Rec, "on advice of counsel", pulled the plug on the subcommittee. It's not easy being an unincorporated area subject to the rule of be Board of Supervisors. Now, thanks to you, decisions affecting us are becoming more centralized, decided in Santa Rosa instead of locally. Is this what you want?

I am tired of your baleful, presence. It seems you hate the admittedly imperfect methods of a free citizenry trying to work out local issues that affect our daily lives. You may be a bright man but you use your "towering" intellect for the self-gratification of being an aspiring vexatious litigant. What a waste! What a pity!
Jon Box
Villa Grande

-----------------------
Letter to the Editor:
On Oct. 2nd the City of Santa Rosa’s Board of Public Utilities voted to certify the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on their Discharge Compliance Project. This project originally examined three indirect and four direct discharges into the Russian River and also continued Laguna discharge. Five of the alternatives were eliminated over time and now only two direct discharges (Healdsburg and Steelhead Beach Park in Forestville) and the Laguna discharge remain.

Each discharge option was sized to accommodate dry weather flows of 26 million gallons a day (mgd) even though actual flows have averaged 16 mgd for the last 14 years. This is clearly an over-sized project meant to accommodate large amounts of future growth at a time when the economy, especially the credit and mortgage industries are suffering enormous setbacks.
The Steelhead Beach option would cause major degradation to a popular County Park and has been strongly opposed. A new group, Friends of Steelhead Beach, have already collected 2500 signatures opposing the project. The original proposal would have destroyed a popular trail and caused major impacts to the highly used beaches in order to install a 48” pipeline that would turn a trail into road and destroy major amounts of riparian habitat. It would also include installing enormous discharge infrastructure under the riverbed.

The project would have major impacts on a very popular swimming beach, including possible long-term contamination by unregulated chemicals. This popular canoeing and boating recreation area would be greatly constrained, if not eliminated for an 18-month construction period. The project would also cost the City about $140 million dollars at a time when City officials are considering the elimination of basic and essential city services, and would guarantee direct wastewater discharges into a cherished river forever.

Park lovers repeatedly requested the City to drop the Steelhead Beach option from consideration. Numerous comment letters and testimony at the meetings extensively challenged City plans. The County Parks Department voiced strong protests about this proposed use through a letter they delivered in person at the meeting. The BPU questioned why the Parks Department didn’t get the letter in sooner. Parks staff alluded to the City’s extremely short turn around period for Final EIR comments.

The Final EIR had been released on September 22nd, giving the affected agencies and concerned citizens only ten days to review its contents. The final EIR included a major revision to the Steelhead Beach proposal moving the pipeline down one half mile further on River Road and impacting a different part of Steelhead Beach Park. The Final EIR reviewed impacts on the Park of the new route but said nothing about impacts to River Rd. This section of River Road is highly compromised environmentally. It is subject to frequent flooding, there is a very narrow shoulder with barriers most of the way to protect drivers from the steep drop next to the road.

There was absolutely no discussion of flooding, riparian (possibly tree cutting), or traffic impacts to River Road in the Final EIR. There was some discussion of further impacts to the Park, but there was no response to the letter submitted by Parks expressing their concerns. It was also announced at the meeting that if the project were selected, there would be no further opportunities for environmental examination or review.

The City had made no contact to discuss any of this with either local citizens, County Parks Department or the Department of Fish and Game. They allowed the public to speak at the meeting, but made it clear that they were under no obligation to consider what anyone had to say in their final decision. In the end, they offered up some contingent opportunities for future citizen input if the project is selected, but none of this was satisfactory in the moment. The truth is they now have a certified EIR for an extremely undesireable project having major impacts.
Project selection is the next step and it is on a fast track. Future meetings include:
BPU Study Session on Project Selection: Nov. 6, 2008
SR Council Review Study Session Results: Nov. 18, 2008
BPU Project Selection/Approval: Dec. 4, 2008
Please try to attend, especially the Dec. 4th meeting.
Brenda Adelman can be contacted at rrwpc@comcast.net


-------------------
Hello Voters!!
I'm usually not one to get too politically involved but this is one issue that affects me very personally. The issue is Proposition 8.

California legalized same-sex marriages and while this is a huge forward step for the gay community, it is possibly about to be taken away!

I realize that not everyone morally agrees with the idea of same-sex couples. Having been with both men and women in my life, I have experienced the unfairness, harassment, ignorance, and openness to being in a same-sex relationship. Who I am is NOT defined by who I am partnered with. I believe that I have always lived my life with dignity, compassion, and respect for others.

When I was in my relationship with Amy for almost 13 years, we did nothing different than everyone else in our day to day lives. We both worked to help keep the household going, we cooked together, we cleaned the house together, we socialized with our friends, we worried about finances and the economy, we took hikes & bike rides, we enjoyed our families, and we had our share of arguments...just like everyone else...straight or gay!!

I am a loving, compassionate, giving, honest, loyal person. Whether I am with a man or a woman does not change that about me. I do not become someone else when I am in a relationship with a woman or with a man. I AM ME!!! And I believe that I deserve the same rights as everyone else in California and on this planet!! Why should I not have the right to marry if I choose to be with a woman? Why should I not be able to benefit from the same laws as my brothers and their wives? Why should not be able to choose my partner in life like everyone else and still be able to take advantage of the family plan at the gym or with my healthcare, or with my partner at her work events, or in making those so difficult decisions about each other in times of serious illness??

I believe that I SHOULD have these rights and be able to stand side by side with all other Americans who have these rights. I believe that I may be different in some of my thoughts, opinions, ideas, and beliefs than others, but aren't YOU!?!?!?

So, what I am getting to here is that I would really appreciate it if each of you would consider what Proposition 8 would mean to the hundreds of thousands of us who are really not that much different than you are, and base your decision on the fact that each of us (me and you and everyone) is entitled to the same rights, the same privileges, the same financial, social and emotional benefits of marriage!

PLEASE VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION 8!!!!
And if you believe we all deserve the same rights as human beings...please encourage others to vote no as well!!

Thanks for taking the time to read this and go out and vote!!!
Love,
Sheri

----------------------

REGARDING: BYPASS
Perhaps I am mistaken in remembering that this county voted for increased gravel extraction with the provision that there would be built a bypass from the intersection of Mirabel Rd. to 6220 HWY 116 in order to reduce the amount of gravel trucks passing through downtown. There was much written in the local papers and a lot of people talking about it. The house at 6220 HWY 116 has been removed in anticipation of making room for the bypass.

What I'd like to know, where is the bypass? In recent publications of the WCG there has been a lot of talk about a roundabout at the intersection of Mirabel Rd. and HWY 116, which is a good thing, but the articles say nothing about how the bypass will be tied into the roundabout. Since passing the proposition for increase in gravel mining, there has been the increase in truck traffic along with the noise and air pollution in downtown Forestville. Where is the bypass?

Perhaps you can let us know where it is in the planning stage and how close it is to actual construction.
Thank you,
Loni Doucette
Forestville

Like most county road projects – this one has a long way to go before it can be constructed. When we voted for measure M, we got some of the money we need for the bypass. It brings us up to about half of the total we need. With budget constraints – it’s hard to say how long it will take to get the other half.

Then there is the sequence of events that is in play. The roundabout will go in first. You can tell how badly it’s needed by trying to get through the Mirabal/116 intersection in the morning school rush. How lovely it will be when traffic doesn’t stop!

Somewhere in there is the Thiessen Forestville Town Square project – which in the current economic climate doesn’t look like a good bet it will be any time soon even though it’s slated for the next few years. The bypass will extend the Mirabel/116 intersection around the back of Forestville Town Square, curve past Meadowlark Homes and come out below Packinghouse Road where the blue house used to be. Yes, that property was purchased by the county and they still have a few more lots to purchase before they have the complete set. Another step in the way.

In the mean time, we are in heavy gravel truck season as roads get repaired in preparation for winter. This is always the highest truck trip time of year because of those necessary repairs. So when you see a truck go by, or many as there are these days, just remember how much you appreciate those repaired roads and bridges on a dark and stormy night. – V

--------------------------

EDITOR:
Tom Lynch has been accusing me of portraying Efren Carrillo's candidacy as the creation of professional handlers, powerful developers, and the agribusiness elite. Yep, I did say those things. Consider how the financing for Efren's campaign first came together. Candidates like Rue Furch and Maddy Hirschfield had been working a long time getting endorsements and contributions prior to launching their campaigns. As the primary contest started up, Rue and Maddy apparently were thought too liberal or too green by the developers and the agribusiness community. Suddenly, after the first candidate forums had already happened, Efren Carrillo catapulted out of relative obscurity to become one of the leading contenders. How? By raising over $45,000 in two months. Suddenly his big signs were on all the fences of Farm Bureau members.

Apparently Efren is worried about what people would think if the saw the short list of his contributors and endorsers, because so far he hasn't published that list on his website. Credible candidates always list their endorsers and contributors. That glaring omission speaks for itself. Rue Furch has stepped out to take clear and reasoned positions on the issues Efren say’s he’s still studying. Check out Rue's website to view all her awards and endorsements. Efren obviously doesn’t want us to see where his key support comes from.

Taking aim at her current opponent for the Third District seat, development cheerleader Sharon Wright has said that a supervisor's job is not for rookies. But Sharon Wright supports Efren, so obviously some rookies are okay with her, so long as the rookie is willing to be a cooperative member of a voting block that puts the interests of upstream developers ahead of the West County's. What we need in the Fifth District is a supervisor who will stand up to Sharon Wright when its time to do that, not one who plants his election signs next to hers, as Efren does. If our Fifth District supervisor should turn out to be a good team player in a Santa Rosa voting bloc on the Board of Supervisors, that's bad news for us. We need a supe who's on OUR team, not theirs, because upstream development will always be a potential threat to our environment, our tourism and our health. Pavement always threatens sustainable agriculture and clean water.

In the final month of this campaign, it will become increasingly clear that the developers have locked arms and opened their wallets to endorse Valery Brown, Sharon Wright and Efren Carrillo as a team. They promote those three to give the Santa Rosa-based power elite control over the future of this county. It’s sad to me that Tom Lynch is helping make that happen.
Tom accuses me of trying to destroy Efren. I'm not. I hope Efren grows up to become an independent future leader. Right now I just don't want him to be our next supervisor.
Scott Kersnar
Guerneville

---------------------
Kellie Noe, a member of the West County Union High School District Board, announced her support today for Rue Furch, candidate for Fifth District Supervisor. Noe said she was impressed with Furch's knowledge of the issues and her ability to work with diverse interests in the community.

"I look forward to working with her at the county level," said Noe, a long-time volunteer in county schools. "Rue will be a leader our young people can look to for wisdom, and her willingness to work collaboratively with Sonoma County schools is admirable. She is committed to the community and will bring continuity to the county Board of Supervisors."

Noe, who was the top vote getter in the 2006 high school board election, ran a grassroots campaign similar to Furch's. "I know that through these efforts, Rue has her finger on the pulse of the needs of West County. I know many young leaders in West County who are stepping up