Santa Rosa is Seeking Wastewater Solution
Please see NEW NOTES and INFO on this subject below. 9/30/08
The City of Santa Rosa, California, is looking for another way to dispose of the wastewater they generate every day. At this point the water is treated to Tertiary level, and although very clean, it still contains elements like heavy metals and pharmaceuticals that can harm waterways, fish and the environment. The challenge is to dispose of the water in a way that is the least harmful. The Geysers Pipeline project takes treated wastewater up Pine Flat Road to geothermal wells managed by Calpine to recharge the steam fields and generate electricity for the Bay Area’s grid. But in very wet years the system generates more recycled water than that project alone can handle. This EIR is the study of alternatives for solving the problem into the future as Santa Rosa grows. Please see the link to view the EIR in this story.
The City of Santa Rosa Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) for the Incremental Recycled Water Program's (IRWP) Discharge Compliance Project (DCP) is ready for public review. http://ci.santa-rosa.ca.us/departments/utilities/irwp/discharge/Pages/studies_reports.aspx
Compliance Project (DCP) is now available for review.
(http://www.SRCity.org/DischargeCompliance)
Please note time change: The BPU will consider EIR certification on October 2 at 5:00 PM instead of 1:30 PM.
In addition, on October 6th the Seasonal Storage Project (SSP) Final EIR will be made available.
http://ci.santa-rosa.ca.us/departments/utilities/irwp/storage/Pages/studies_reports.aspx
Information about the DCP and SSP, and the availability of their Final EIRs follows below. These documents are being provided within a close time frame to allow for the opportunity to cross reference them, in response to input we have received from the public.
Upcoming Activities
Discharge Compliance Project:
Final EIR available for Review - September 22, 2008
BPU considers EIR Certification - October 2, 2008* (Starts at 5PM and will be televised) BPU will probably certify the EIR. This is NOT a hearing but people will be given the opportunity to speak. There is no legal requirement for the BPU to consider anything that is said at that meeting. It is unlikely that they would make any changes to the EIR at that point before they certify.
BPU Study Session re: Project Selection - November 6, 2008
BPU has a study session at their regular meeting. They will probably take public comments at this meeting as well, but no decision would be made at this meeting.
SR Council Review Study Session Results - November 18, 2008 (about 5 PM) This discussion with probably have time for the public to speak. No decision would be made here.
BPU Project Selection/Approval - December 4, 2008 This is the meeting where they will select a project. This is the last chance for comments and public testimony.
Seasonal Storage Project:
Final EIR available for Review - October 6, 2008
BPU considers EIR Certification - October 16, 2008
The meetings where certification will be considered are held during Board of Public Utilities (BPU) meetings in the Santa Rosa Council Chamber, 100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Santa Rosa.
All meetings will be at 1:30 PM, *except the October 2nd meeting, which will be at 5 PM. Confirm agenda and schedule at http://www.SRCity.org/BPU.
WHERE TO FIND COPIES OF THE DCP and SSP FINAL EIRs
Both Final EIRs will be available for review at Sonoma County Branch Libraries in Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park/Cotati, Sebastopol, and Windsor and on the project Web site at www.SRCity.org/IRWP.
The DCP Final EIR will also be available at the libraries in Cloverdale, Guerneville, Healdsburg, Occidental, Petaluma, Forestville and Lakeport. The Final EIRs, appendices and reference material cited in the Final EIRs will also be available for review at the Laguna Plant Library, located at 4300 Llano Road, Santa Rosa. Hard copies and CDs of the Final EIRs will be available for purchase by calling ARC at 707-579-9096. (Prices at ARC are as follows: $100 per set of
2 volumes, $10 per CD and $8 per Executive Summary)
Please contact our office if you have any questions.
Other helpful site addresses are available at:
http://www.SRCity.org/DischargeCompliance
http://www.SRCity.org/SeasonalStorage
http://www.SRCity.org/BPU
http://www.SRCity.org/IRWP
NEW NOTES 9/30/08
Mark Millan called to say he has received some panic concerns and questions from people - this is his summary to allay fears:
The Laguna Site is noted in the EIR as the Environmentally Superior Alternative meaning it has the fewest or least significant effects on the environment. See pages 1-10 and 11 of the EIR. Steelhead Beach (Site D1) would be 20 to 30 times more costly (140 to 174 million) than the Laguna site.
The Russian River would not be closed for any period of time if they chose the Steelhead Beach site (D1) - they would use what is called a Coffer Dam that holds water back from where they are working - forcing the river around the dam - not stopping the flow.
Santa Rosa is in serious budget crisis - like the rest of the world - and simply doesn't have the resources to do a large scale project. But - they have to meet NCRWCB regulations for oxygen and temperature, thus the study and project. Plus CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) requires they study a range of feasible projects.
Calpine (The Geysers) would like just about every drop of water Santa Rosa creates so discharge would only be necessary in wet years when there is too much water coming through the treatment plant.
Leaky Pipes - they finally heard Brenda - are being fixed at a very slow rate - but have increasingly been recognized as a major source of inflow into the treatment plant.
Moving the Steelhead project site up River Road was intended to reduce the environmental impacts to the area. Steelhead Beach and Osprey Trail. - CEQA requires impacts to be avoided where possible.
Reverse Osmosis, also known as Advanced Membrane Treatment (AMT) facilities were reviewed in the EIR for each proposed discharge site including at the Laguna. Consideration for using AMT as a strategy to meet regulatory compliance is evaluated in the EIR and you can find it in the Draft EIR in Volume 4 of 6; Section 3.3.3., on page 51.
Also see Volume 6 of 6, TM-D10 Advance Membrane Treatment Evaluation, which
goes in to great detail how this type of treatment could be used.
All available on line at:
http://ci.santa-rosa.ca.us/departments/utilities/irwp/discharge/Pages/studies_reports.aspx
Source:
Mark Millan
Public Information Coordinator
www.SRCity.org/IRWP
707.836.0300
EM: millan@DataInstincts.com
COMMENTS from Brenda Adelman 9/30/08
Much of what Mark has written is basically correct and what I have been saying for years. What he doesn’t say is why they want concerned citizens to back off just as the big decision is going to be made. They are feeling the heat from concerned citizens now who have been alerted to their pending decisions.
The City has already removed five options from this proposal and were asked repeatedly to take this one off as well and they refused. They are now working very hard to get people in the community to back off at a critical juncture. Yet, the City has spent six years and about $16 million planning this direct discharge into the Russian River. Does it make sense that they would back off this easily?
Mark is a very nice man, but the City is absolutely not to be trusted in this. They have a long history of spinning and ignoring, etc. things we have been saying for years. Why is it, at this critical point in time, they are all of a sudden agreeing with us? Why are trying to diffuse public interest in the up coming decisions that will have very significant legal implications that will seal our fate on river discharge? It is imperative that the people speak out now and not buy into these empty assurances. Until the meetings/hearings are held and the votes are counted, we have NO assurance that what he says will happen.
Brenda
Labels: COMMUNITIES, ENVIRONMENT, PARTICIPATE, Sonoma County News
Read article »