Vesta Copestakes
Email Vesta
Blog Home Page

Welcome to the West County Gazette EXTRA! Blog. Your contributions are always welcome...all-month-long. Just e-mail me. Thanks for keeping the lines of communication open for our neighbors of Sonoma County home towns.


Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Sonoma County Protests Propisition 8



RALLY TO PROTEST THE PASSING OF PROPOSITION 8

Rallies are being held around the state and nationally to protest the state of California writing discrimination into our constitution.

We will be rallying in Sonoma County
Saturday November 15th, 10:30am at Courthouse Square in Santa Rosa.
between 3rd & 4th Streets at Mendocino Avenue


Come and show your support. All are welcome!
A lawsuit is being filed, we're trying to get Sonoma County to sign on to the lawsuit as a petitioner. Our Democratic State Representatives have signed on to a "Friends of the Court" brief to show their support for equal rights.
Come and stand for equality!


Below are two essays submitted to WCG on this subject - there are more. Thanks for reading.


PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF THE MINORITY
FROM THE TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY

The Saga of Proposition 8

By Maddy Hirshfield

Election Night, November 4th, 2008 will go down as a night of mixed results and mixed emotions. Never has my heart been so lifted and so broken all at once. The same night that brought an end to the wretched truism that only a white man could be elected president, brought us news that the people of California had decided to enshrine bigotry and discrimination into our state constitution.

As of 1:09 pm, Monday November 10, Prop 8 stood at 52.3% Yes and 47.7% No. Out of almost 11 million votes cast that's a difference of a little less than half a million. There's a law suit in process that Los Angeles; San Francisco and Santa Clara have filed and the wheels are turning to get Sonoma County signed on as a co-petitioner.

Proposition 8 is but the latest chapter in a tortured story of the struggle for equal rights, a story of the intolerant seeking to use the most sacred tools of democracy to demonize and marginalize those with whom they disagree. In 2000, its predecessor, Proposition 22, was overwhelmingly passed in California. Prop 22 consisted of fourteen words: "Only marriage between a man and women is valid or recognized in California." On May 15th, 2008, the Republican-dominated, moderately conservative California Supreme Court struck down Proposition 22. Chief Justice Ron George wrote for the majority: "Our state now recognizes that an individual's capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship with another person and responsibly to care for and raise children does not depend upon the individual's sexual orientation," The statement by George went on: "An individual's sexual orientation -- like a person's race or gender -- does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights."

At that point, the only thing left for those in opposition to marriage equality was to have those same fourteen words written into our Constitution. The good news: All they had was fear and intimidation. The bad news: fear and intimidation worked.

The lawsuit now being filed is an argument over whether Proposition 8 constitutes an "amendment" or a "revision" as each needs to find its way to the ballot via a different path. But that's for the legal types to sort out. On the practical side, I simply do not understand how it's possible to write discrimination INTO the constitution. What if a group of people got together and were successful getting an initiative on the ballot that would amend our Constitution to make it illegal for Latinos to have bank accounts, or for people of color to sit anywhere on the bus they wanted, or drink from the water fountain of their choosing. And let's for argument sake say that amendment to the Constitution passed by a majority of voters. Would we then simply sit back and say, "Oh well, the people have spoken?" Of course not!

Our adversaries say gays have all the rights of marriage now with domestic partnership. Even if that were true -- which it is not -- we learned a long time ago that separate is not equal. Back in the days when people of color had to ride in the back of the bus and drink from separate fountains they still reached their destinations and had their thirst quenched. But we stopped doing that because we figured out it was wrong to treat people differently ... and it still is.

However, here is my glass-half-full view of things as we move forward in this process.

• Statewide, we came so much closer to defeating Prop 8 than we did with Prop 22 in 2000.

• We here in Sonoma County turned Prop 8 down by more than 40 percentage points, we only defeated Prop 22 by 6.

• I've received beautiful, supportive emails from friends who say they just don't understand. And they tell me about conversations with co-workers who feel the same.

• I also get emails from supporters who tell me they know it's coming because they listen to their 12-year-old kids talking with their friends, and the 12-year-olds don't get what the problem is either.

• And ... Barack Obama was elected President of the United States.

I literally sobbed through our new President-elect's entire acceptance speech. And when he got to the part where he said "all Americans" must come together, "black, white, young, old, gay, straight"... a voice in my head kept saying, "it's going to be all right" over and over again, "it's going to be all right."

I believe in "protecting the rights of the minority from the tyranny of the majority" and I have faith that's exactly what we will do.

I also have faith that it will be all right because the majority will soon be the minority. Those 12 year olds are growing up … and we older folks live to fight another day.

Onward!

Maddy Hirshfield is a long time political activist. She currently works for Assemblywoman Patty Berg who recently signed on to a "Friend of the Court" brief along with a majority of other legislators to overturn Prop 8."

--------------

An open letter to supporters of Prop 8:

My name is Sabina and I and coming out of the closet to tell you...that I'm left-handed. Yes I know that it's been apparent for most of my life, but I need to publicly state it.

What's the big deal about being a lefty? Well these days society's majority of right-handers doesn't look down on the 10% of us who aren't, but that hasn't been the case for most of history.

The settlers of this country used left-handedness as evidence of being in league with the Devil. Yes, being a southpaw in Salem was proof of being a witch and reason enough to burn or drown you.

Being left-handed was always seen as being suspect, of not being normal, of being other. The Romans considered the right side the source of good, and all negative things as emanating from the left. In fact, the Latin for "the left side" is sinister, with all the connotations and meanings that word still carries today.

Even as recently as the last century being left-handed was looked on as being wrong somehow. My great-uncle Alberto was born lefty. His family tied his arm to his side and forced him to use his right hand. In the end, his community still looked at him as a left-handed man who was using his right instead.

And why this suspicion of lefties? No one has ever been able to give me a satisfactory reason. I hear a lot of stuff about the Bible and "the right-hand of G-d," about how it doesn't look normal, about being taught to think that way. Mostly I hear about how being different from the norm is wrong.

Luckily for me, people--and society-- have the ability to change their views. When it became apparent that I was left-handed, my parents did not try to change me. In fact, my family and community did not even give any notice to it. It was just a part of who I was, along with my blue eyes or my brown hair. And while it can sometimes be a challenge to be a lefty--guitars are strung wrong, scissors don't cut correctly, the design on my coffee mug never faces me when I drink from it--I know that being different is not seen as being not-normal.

By the way, I also happen to be Jewish and gay. Most people have let go of their discrimination of the former; it's not seen as acceptable for Americans to voice anti-Semitic comments. I look forward to the day when you let go of your fear of the latter as well. You can change the way you've been taught to look at people who are different from you.

Sabina Fried
Sebastopol

Labels: , ,


Read article »

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Election 2008 - Sonoma County & the Nation- LETTERS



Thank you for your comments - I will post them as they come in. This is an exciting time in all our lives for many reasons. We won some, we lost some - but the bottom line is we have a lot of work to do to heal our nation and bring our country closer to the values that established our government: Freedom and Justice for All. As the saying goes: be part of the solution.

I'll post new comments from the top down from here out - thanks for checking in!

Apparently we're still on hold for the 5th District Supervisor race - so when I know, I'll post the results.

Thank You!

-------------------------
Newsflash!!! Santa Rosa! Sebastopol! The Scooter Lady is flying an American flag on her Yamaha! Could it be the election????

Love , Cecile Lusby

-----------------------------

Whoopee! Now I can dust off The Flag and hang it up proudly once again.
Yours in euphoria, Joyce

-------------------------

Dear V,
Frankly with Barack Obama as President I am so elated that even the Prop 8 is not frightening -- now we don't have to fear about the Supreme Court for at least 4 years -- hopefully 8 -- and that, will ultimately be the way to make sure we all have equal rights...

I have received emails from my family all over the world with congratulations -- and mostly they are conservative -- but they are all elated about the US and the world's future now....

Oh, and California high speed rail -- about bloody time...

David ;)

---------------------------

Dear Vesta:

I am disgusted now that Prop 8 did not pass. I want to encourage the gay community to not be so polite next time and bring up the fact that the in all the Bibles of the homophobic church people, that it states that "adulterers and fornicators do not inherit the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6:9-11)." Also, in the Hebrew scriptures, those horny heterosexual busted in the act were stoned to death. Let us all create a new proposition and reinstate the Biblical stoning law for all the hypocritical church people that are shacking up-living in sin, having heterosexual sex before they are married, cheating on spouses, after years of having sex with family members who then resort to raping women, having sex with children and animals.

I mention the above crimes against humanity because I know of so many King Henry VIII inspired Protestant religions that "do not consider such atrocities as cheating on their spouses so that their partners do not have scriptural backing to get a divorce and get away from them." Especially "if their victims did not scream bloody murder with a gun pointed at their head in the middle of nowhere & had two to three witnesses to the act. (2 Corinthians 13:1; 1 Timothy 5:19) The same turn the other cheek to the pervert rule applies if more than one victim has been attacked by the same garden variety fruitcake, and statistically a Protestant Caucasian and heterosexual male. This makes their houses of worship a safe haven for sex offenders yet demonizes their victims. These are scriptures that we are told "are inspired of God" that were most likely written by horny old goats that could empathize with such swine to let them get away with it. I think an intelligent higher power would be insulted to have such low class laws be slanderously written in stone by imperfect men and have to take the blame for them.

Heterosexual "loose conduct" as Christians like to call it, cheapens their relationship with their creator and their marriage is not sacred in the eyes of God (Hebrews 13:4). I know my hypocritical horny Christian neighbors married and divorced a few times with several sets of kids will disagree with me as they say "what gay people do in the bedroom is unorthodox." They have taken a Sharpie and blacked out where it says next to homosexuals which they have highlighted in bright yellow, "Do not be misled...neither fornicators and adulterers will inherit the kingdom of God." Sorry Christians...you are on the same playing field as regards to "sin" as homosexuals. One sin is not greater than the other. Now back to that proposition, let's get the stoning of heterosexuals on the ballot next time. Who knows, maybe it can be made into one of those tacky American reality shows! I think that would be a big hit with a never ending supply of cast members! (humor)

I am a heterosexual woman that is sick of the hypocritical application of the scriptures that only benefits the majority of the population. Nine times of ten, homosexuals have nothing to do with heterosexual divorce or bringing down the scared institution of it. I think that "rafter" scripture should apply here since there is much husband and wife swapping and perversions in so called "Christian" churches among the heterosexuals in the congregation that account for about 95% of the moral atrophy in our society. Thanks for hearing me gripe!

Sincerely glad Obama won,

Rachele Ketchem
Sebastopol

----------------------

MY NEW MANTRA IS IF BARAK CAN DO IT THEN I WILL KEEP GOING TOO - Sandra

-------------------------

Submitted by Carole and Big Man:

An Open Letter to Barack Obama - By Alice Walker (Nov. 5, 2008)
Today at
8:44am | Nov. 5, 2008

http://www.theroot.com/id/48726

Dear Brother Obama,

You have no idea, really, of how profound this moment is for us. Us being the black people of the Southern United States. You think you know, because you are thoughtful, and you have studied our history. But seeing you deliver the torch so many others before you carried, year after year,
decade after decade, century after century, only to be struck down before igniting the flame of justice and of law, is almost more than the heart can bear. And yet, this observation is not intended to burden you, for you are of a different time, and, indeed, because of all the relay
runners before you, North America is a different place. It is really only to say: Well done. We knew, through all the generations, that you were with us, in us, the best of the spirit of Africa and of the Americas. Knowing this, that you would actually appear, someday, was part of our
strength. Seeing you take your rightful place, based solely on your wisdom, stamina and character, is a balm for the weary warriors of hope, previously only sung about.

I would advise you to remember that you did not create the disaster that the world is experiencing, and you alone are not responsible for bringing the world back to balance. A primary responsibility that you do have, however, is to cultivate happiness in your own life. To make a schedule that permits sufficient time of rest and play with your gorgeous wife and
lovely daughters. And so on. One gathers that your family is large. We are used to seeing men in the White House soon become juiceless and as white-haired as the building; we notice their wives and children looking strained and stressed. They soon have smiles so lacking in joy that they remind us of scissors. This is no way to lead. Nor does your family deserve this fate. One way of thinking about all this is: It is so bad now that there is no excuse not to relax. From your happy, relaxed state, you can model real success, which is all that so many people in the world
really want. They may buy endless cars and houses and furs and gobble up all the attention and space they can manage, or barely manage, but this is because it is not yet clear to them that success is truly an inside job. That it is within the reach of almost everyone.

I would further advise you not to take on other people's enemies. Most damage that others do to us is out of fear, humiliation and pain. Those feelings occur in all of us, not just in those of us who profess a certain religious or racial devotion. We must learn actually not to have
enemies, but only confused adversaries who are ourselves in disguise. It is understood by all that you are commander in chief of the United States and are sworn to protect our beloved country; this we understand, completely. However, as my mother used to say, quoting a Bible with which
I often fought, "hate the sin, but love the sinner." There must be no more crushing of whole communities, no more torture, no more dehumanizing as a means of ruling a people's spirit. This has already happened to people of color, poor people, women, children. We see where this leads, where it has led.

A good model of how to "work with the enemy" internally is presented by the Dalai Lama, in his endless caretaking of his soul as he confronts the Chinese government that invaded Tibet. Because, finally, it is the soul that must be preserved, if one is to remain a credible leader. All else might be lost; but when the soul dies, the connection to earth, to peoples, to animals, to rivers, to mountain ranges, purple and majestic, also dies. And your smile, with which we watch you do gracious battle with unjust characterizations, distortions and lies, is that expression of healthy self-worth, spirit and soul, that, kept happy and free and relaxed, can find an answering smile in all of us, lighting our way, and brightening the world.

We are the ones we have been waiting for.

In Peace and Joy,
Alice Walker

---------------------

Obama's campaign, and its success, reminds me of how the Republican party laid claim to the American flag after 911. Democrats everywhere were saying “it's our flag, too!” Now whites are looking at Obama and saying - he's our white man, too. The beauty of this man - beyond his incredible intelligence, his calm demeanor and everything else exceptional about him - is that he is multi-racial. He IS the American melting pot. We can ALL claim to be in his blood - his blood in ours. We are all ONE! - Vesta

------------------

PROFESSORS AVAILABLE FOR COMMENT ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
- POLITICAL, CULTURAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ISSUES


DR. DON ROMESBURG, a historian and professor of Women's and Gender Studies, is available for discussion of political and cultural issues regarding same-sex marriage. Dr. Romesburg is currently teaching an entire undergraduate course framed around the social, economic, political and cultural issues related to same-sex marriage.

He is doing research on the relationship between political discourses about marriage equality and LGBT civil rights and cultural representations of queer youth. Romesburg has also lectured on issues of race and gender in the battle over Proposition 8.

Romesburg is one of the many same-sex couples married in San Francisco in 2004 and again in California after the state's Supreme Court ruling earlier this year. He lives with his husband and daughter in San Francisco.

Office: 707.664.2474
Cell: 415.850.8580
Email: romesbur@sonoma.edu



DR. JULIE SHULMAN, Assistant Professor of Counseilng and a licensed psychologist, is available for discussion regarding the mental health of individuals in same-sex couples.

She can comment on the challenges and stressors of people in same-sex relationships, and she can specificaly address the experiences of marriage legislation and marriage access among people who are in same-sex relationships, including those in legal marriages and domestic partnerships.

Dr. Shulman teaches master's students training to be professional counselors, specilalizing in women and sexual minorities. She has presented her research at regional and national conferences.on the mental health of lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals as well as the psychological experiences among people in same-sex couples.

Office: 707.644.3395
Email: julie.shulman@sonoma.edu

Labels: , , ,


Read article »

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Election 2008 - Sonoma County & the Nation



Well - one thing about the Obama-Biden ticket is that they want to build peace and prosperity from the bottom up. Trickle down economics never did work. So now we have a chance to see if bottom up not only creates a better economic climate for us all, but that having our basic needs on top of the priority list will create the comfort we all seek, and that translates to less anger - which translates to less violence. If all goes well, this will spread across the planet. Comfortable people are rarely angry enough to kill others. Motivated by ambition rather than anger. What a concept!

Now let's see how that translates to California politics - then to Sonoma County...


NATION - all of us who were optimistic that the Obama-Biden team could make it all the way to the White House have been proven correct. Manifesting the name President Barrack Obama worked - how very California! Congratulations to every person who volunteered to help make this happen. Now we have even more volunteering to do to make our agenda reality over the next decade. This is a team effort that will take years to accomplish.

There are plenty of opportunities. Please refer to the Volunteer section of my newspaper where every month there are ways you can become involved in our community and make changes happen every day toward a better world.

STATE - I'll keep checking the results until they are final and make any changes I see coming our way.

My high hopes for Equality & Justice for All - and I do mean all - from chickens in cages to lovers in churches and teenage girls with embryos developing in their bellies - have been dashed. This election is a bi-polar moment in history. Many of us feel elation and depression all at once.

On a county level - as you can see below - we seem to be on the same page. So we are safe at home. How very fine for us. On a state level - we have a lot of work to do. I believe our national constitution is about that wonderful concept of freedom of choice and equality and justice for all. How many times do we need to repeat the phrase to get people to understand that THIS is what our country stands for. You can't label people as exception to those rules. Our work is cut out for us as the saying goes. We need to challenge Prop 8 supporters on a Constituitional level.

SONOMA COUNTY - The corner of Hwy 116 and Hwy 12 in downtown Sebastopol has always been a place where people let their opinions be known with placards and waves to cars driving by. Some support Our Troops, others oppose war & violence. On election eve it was Efren vs. Rue, Prop 8 yes and no, Prop 2 yes - I saw no No. Kathleen Shaffer and her husband inspiring voters to support Kathleen.

What happens best of all at these gatherings is that opposing forces have a chance to spend time with each other. Communication is the key to changing minds. Let's keep talking. But as I like to say - it's not “I'm right - you're wrong” that works. We need to respect other's opinions and simplye xpress our own without making the other person wrong. They will listen if we approach subjects that way. Dialogue - not monologue.

You are always welcome to add your opinions. That's what this newspaper is all about. Whether on the web or in print - let me know what's on your minds at vesta@sonic.net.

Sonoma County Consolidated General Election
This is how WE voted - not that state or the nation - November 4, 2008

Election Results as of 11/05/2008 at 9:30pm

President and Vice President
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Displayed as Vote Count then Percentage (hard to translate this into this format)
Obama/Biden, Dem 144,399-73.5%
McCain/Palin, Rep 47,184-24.0%
Nader/Gonzalez, PF 1,633-0.8%
Barr/Root, Lib 1,065-0.5%
McKinney/Clemente, Grn 707-0.4%
Keyes/Drake, AIP 692-0.4%
Write-in candidate(s) 674-0.3%


U S Representative 1st District
Completed Precincts: 87 of 87
Vote Count-Percentage
Mike Thompson, Dem 20,581-68.6%
Zane Starkewolf, Rep 7,123-23.8%
Carol Wolman, Grn 2,237-7.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 46-0.2%


U S Representative 6th District
Completed Precincts: 366 of 366
Vote Count-Percentage
Lynn Woolsey, Dem 113,296-70.6%
Mike Halliwell, Rep 39,976-24.9%
Joel R Smolen, Lib 6,986-4.4%
Write-in candidate(s) 241-0.2%


State Senator 3rd District
Completed Precincts: 158 of 158
Vote Count-Percentage
Mark Leno, Dem 48,272 -1.2%
Sashi McEntee, Rep 19,475-28.7%
Write-in candidate(s) 94-0.1%


Member of Assembly 1st District
Completed Precincts: 133 of 133
Vote Count-Percentage
Wesley Chesbro, Dem 37,048-74.3%
Jim Pell, Rep 12,718-25.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 103-0.2%


Member of Assembly 6th District
Completed Precincts: 161 of 161
Vote Count-Percentage
Jared Huffman, Dem 46,362-66.0%
Paul Lavery, Rep 18,397-26.2%
Timothy J Hannan, Lib 5,221-7.4%
Write-in candidate(s) 237-0.3%


Member of Assembly 7th District
Completed Precincts: 159 of 159
Vote Count-Percentage
Noreen Evans, Dem 48,513-73.2%
Doris Gentry, Rep 17,629-26.6%
Write-in candidate(s) 99-0.1%


Sonoma County Board of Education Area 1
Completed Precincts: 78 of 78
Vote Count-Percentage
Alex Bantis 12,149-50.0%
John A Musilli 12,080-49.7%
Write-in candidate(s) 85-0.3%


So Co Jr College Dist Santa Rosa Area
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 157 of 157
Vote Count-Percentage
Richard W Call 36,369 -40.3%
Keith Woods 26,945-29.8%
Don Edgar 26,729-29.6%
Write-in candidate(s) 257-0.3%


Calistoga Joint Unified School District
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 3 of 3
Vote Count Percentage
Mary Burke Montez 137-28.4%
Marty Hunt 102-21.2%
Paul Schlieder 93-19.3%
Marco DiGiulio 86-17.8%
Michael Feiner 64-13.3%
Write-in candidate(s) 0-0.0%


Cloverdale Unified School District
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 8 of 8
Vote Count-Percentage
Karen J Scalabrini 2,513-29.0%
Dianna MacDonald 2,414-27.9%
Dick Johnson 1,965-22.7%
Daniel L Bunting 1,764-20.4%
Write-in candidate(s) 6-0.1%


Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 35 of 35
Vote Count-Percentage
Ed Gilardi 8,762-35.5%
Karyn Pulley 8,091-32.7%
Marc Orloff 7,776-31.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 86-0.3%


Windsor Unified School District
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 31 of 31
Vote Count-Percentage
George R Valenzuela 5,575-38.3%
Ted Seche 5,091-35.0%
Shari Kirichenko-Egan 3,876-26.6%
Write-in candidate(s) 23-0.2%


Bellevue Union School District
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 21 of 21
Vote Count-Percentage
Debra A Mills 2,03- 36.2%
Yvonne L Kennedy 1,790-31.9%
Katherine Holden 1,766-31.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 23-0.4%


Forestville Union School District
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 8 of 8
Vote Count-Percentage
Jean Bullard 1,634-37.4%
Ron Abler 1,372-31.4%
Guy Eck 1,348-30.9%
Write-in candidate(s) 15-0.3%


Liberty School District
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 2 of 2
Vote Count-Percentage
Geraldine T Johnston 578-43.6%
Ronald K Evenich 533-40.2%
Albert J Romano 209-15.8%
Write-in candidate(s) 5-0.4%


County Supervisor 1st District
Completed Precincts: 119 of 119
Vote Count Percentage
Valerie K Brown 20,891-51.2%
Will Pier 19,786-48.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 130-0.3%


County Supervisor 3rd District
Completed Precincts: 71 of 71
Vote Count Percentage
Shirlee Zane 17,318-55.3%
Sharon Wright 13,83- 44.2%
Write-in candidate(s) 166-0.5%


County Supervisor 5th District
Completed Precincts: 91 of 91
Vote Count-Percentage
Efren Carrillo 17,395-50.8%
Rue Furch 16,725-48.8%
Write-in candidate(s) 132-0.4%


Member, City Council Santa Rosa F/T
Vote For: 4
Completed Precincts: 107 of 107
Vote Count Percentage
Gary Wysocky 25,211 13.7%
John Sawyer 24,613 13.4%
Ernesto Olivares 22,990 12.5%
Marsha Vas Dupre 20,608 11.2%
Lee Pierce 19,266 10.5%
Don Taylor 18,383 10.0%
Michael Allen 16,406 8.9%
Bobbi Hoff 13,675 7.4%
Carol Dean 12,265 6.7%
Eddie Alvarez 6,468 3.5%
Hans Dippel 4,222 2.3%
Write-in candidate(s) 192 0.1%


Member, City Council Santa Rosa S/T
Completed Precincts: 107 of 107
Vote Count Percentage
Jane Bender 23,042 45.7%
Judy Kennedy 10,719 21.3%
David Rosas 9,659 19.2%
Lawrence R Wiesner 6,781 13.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 192 0.4%


Member, City Council Cloverdale F/T
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 5 of 5
Vote Count Percentage
Mary Ann Brigham 2,033 39.1%
Augustine Gus Wolter 1,641 31.6%
Luciano Toninato 1,513 29.1%
Write-in candidate(s) 6 0.1%


Member, City Council Cloverdale S/T
Completed Precincts: 5 of 5
Vote Count Percentage
Jessalee Raymond 2,497 98.0%
Write-in candidate(s) 50 2.0%


City Clerk Cloverdale
Completed Precincts: 5 of 5
Vote Count Percentage
Michele P Winterbottom 2,523 98.8%
Write-in candidate(s) 31 1.2%


Member, City Council Cotati
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 5 of 5
Vote Count Percentage
Janet Orchard 1,385 20.1%
Robert Coleman 1,363 19.7%
Mike Kurvers 1,153 16.7%
George Barich 1,129 16.4%
Susan Harvey 1,089 15.8%
Eric Kirchmann 773 11.2%
Write-in candidate(s) 10 0.1%


Member, City Council Healdsburg
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 8 of 8
Vote Count Percentage
Mike Mc Guire 3,939 35.7%
Tom Chambers 2,673 24.2%
Gary W Plass 2,571 23.3%
Tony Pastene 1,842 16.7%
Write-in candidate(s) 10 0.1%


Member, City Council Petaluma
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 38 of 38
Vote Count Percentage
David Glass 12,850 22.4%
Mike Healy 10,608 18.5%
Tiffany Renee 9,972 17.4%
Karen Nau 9,326 16.3%
Samantha Freitas 7,928 13.8%
Spence F Burton 6,521 11.4%
Write-in candidate(s) 49 0.1%


Member, City Council Rohnert Park
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 28 of 28
Vote Count Percentage
Gina Belforte 5,870 17.2%
Jake Mackenzie 5,248 15.4%
Joseph T Callinan 5,242 15.4%
John Borba 5,085 14.9%
Tim Smith 4,533 13.3%
Vicki Vidak-Martinez 4,085 12.0%
Dawna Gallagher 3,923 11.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 62 0.2%


Member, City Council Sebastopol
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 6 of 6
Vote Count Percentage
Guy Wilson 2,091 35.5%
Kathleen Shaffer 2,089 35.5%
JenThille 1,341 22.8%
Colleen Fernald 355 6.0%
Write-in candidate(s) 10 0.2%


Member, Town Council Windsor
Vote For: 2
Completed Precincts: 22 of 22
Vote Count Percentage
Debora Fudge 5,719 36.8%
Cheryl Scholar 4,188 27.0%
Julie Adamson 2,804 18.1%
Leroy Dysart 2,796 18.0%
Write-in candidate(s) 19 0.1%


Rincon Valley Fire Protection Dist
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 59 of 59
Vote Count Percentage
Patricia P Waldow 5,491 28.7%
Darrel J Mead 5,486 28.6%
James M Bouler 4,796 25.0%
John Hamann 3,361 17.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 31 0.2%


Valley of the Moon Fire Protection Dist
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 18 of 18
Vote Count Percentage
Dawn Mittleman 4,459 29.6%
William Norton 4,340 28.8%
Ray Brunton 3,974 26.4%
Elissa Wadleigh 2,251 14.9%
Write-in candidate(s) 36 0.2%


Windsor Fire Protection Dist
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 26 of 26
Vote Count Percentage
Victor Pozzi 4,402 23.3%
John D Nelson 4,109 21.8%
Adam Joseph Brolan 3,834 20.3%
Richard Olufs 3,751 19.9%
Myron Steele 2,768 14.7%
Write-in candidate(s) 27 0.1%


Petaluma Health Care District
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 62 of 62
Vote Count Percentage
Fran Adams 13,876 22.1%
Stephen Steady 12,205 19.5%
Robert Ostroff 10,605 16.9%
Liz Close 9,712 15.5%
Robert C Hill 8,267 13.2%
Gerald S Besses 8,006 12.8%
Write-in candidate(s) 77 0.1%


Sonoma Valley Health Care District
Vote For: 3
Completed Precincts: 42 of 42
Vote Count Percentage
Peter Hohorst 8,275 30.4%
Madolyn Agrimonti 6,428 23.6%
Bill Boerum 6,341 23.3%
Bill Gurry 6,124 22.5%
Write-in candidate(s) 77 0.3%


PROP 1A - Safe, Reliable Passenger Train Bond Act
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 120,662 63.9%
No 68,229 36.1%


PROP 2 - Standards For Confining Farm Animals
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 120,231 63.2%
No 70,157 36.8%


PROP 3 - Children's Hospital Bond Act
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 88,335 47.9%
No 96,168 52.1%


PROP 4 - Waiting Period Term Minor's Pregnancy
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 63,319 33.5%
No 125,953 66.5%


PROP 5 - Nonviolent Drug Offenses. Sentencing
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 81,365 43.6%
No 105,440 56.4%


PROP 6 - Funds For Law Enforcement. Penalties
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 41,247 22.6%
No 141,195 77.4%


PROP 7 - Renewable Energy Generation
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 60,001 32.1%
No 126,916 67.9%


PROP 8 - Eliminate Right of Same-Sex Couples
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 65,898 33.9%
No 128,466 66.1%


PROP 9 -Criminal Justice Victims' Rights. Parole
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 82,392 45.8%
No 97,400 54.2%


PROP 10 - Alternative Fuel Vehicles. Bonds
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 62,726 34.4%
No 119,858 65.6%


PROP 11 - Redistricting Constitutional Amendment
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 92,428 53.0%
No 81,975 47.0%


PROP 12 - Veterans' Bond Act of 2008
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 118,808 66.0%
No 61,319 34.0%


Measure J - Bellevue Union School Dist. Bonds
Completed Precincts: 21 of 21
Vote Count Percentage
Bonds Yes 2,892 68.8%
Bonds No 1,312 31.2%


Measure K - Petaluma Reduce Wastewater Rates
Completed Precincts: 38 of 38
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 10,519 45.8%
No 12,468 54.2%


Measure L - Rohnert Park Reduce Sewer Rates
Completed Precincts: 28 of 28
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 7,269 52.9%
No 6,485 47.1%


Measure M - Sebastopol Utility Users Tax
Completed Precincts: 6 of 6
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 2,155 59.4%
No 1,471 40.6%


Measure N - Windsor Transient Occupancy Tax
Completed Precincts: 22 of 22
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 6,827 70.2%
No 2,896 29.8%


Measure O - Gold Ridge Fire District Parcel Tax
Completed Precincts: 21 of 21
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 5,814 75.7%
No 1,867 24.3%


Measure P - Sonoma Vly Health Care Dist Bond
Completed Precincts: 42 of 42
Vote Count Percentage
Bonds Yes 13,021 80.8%
Bonds No 3,093 19.2%


Measure Q - SMART Rail Quarter Cent Sales Tax
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Vote Count Percentage
Yes 138,624 73.5%
No 50,047 26.5%


Registration and Turnout Total
Completed Precincts: 453 of 453
Reg/Turnout Percentage
Total Registered Voters 248,122
Precinct Registration 248,122
Precinct Ballots Cast 87,167 35.1%
Absentee Ballots Cast 110,657 44.6%
Total Ballots Cast 197,824 79.7%

For more information and updates:
http://www.sonoma-county.org/regvoter/elections/Results/results.asp


Labels: , , ,


Read article »

Thursday, October 30, 2008

VOTE NO on Proosition 8



From Rachele Ketchem, Sebastopol - “I find it almost funny that 95% of the population is worried about the 5% gay population bringing down the institution of marriage and feel they need to make example of a small percentage of the population that nine times out of ten has nothing to do with a heterosexual divorce. What about the heterosexuals who cheapen the institution of biblical marriage…”


I find it almost funny that 95% of the population is worried about the 5% gay population bringing down the institution of marriage and feel they need to make example of a small percentage of the population that nine times out of ten has nothing to do with a heterosexual divorce. What about the heterosexuals who cheapen the institution of biblical marriage and have sex before they are married? You know fornicators!

What about those that like to have a number of people to sleep around with while married or the people that find it a sport to sleep with married individuals and break up marriages? You know adulterers! What about the sadists & masochists, exhibitionists, porn addicts, the folks who add to human trafficking and frequent prostitutes and strip clubs? What about the predominantly Caucasian Protestant rapists and pedophiles bringing down, not only the institution of marriage but add to the moral atrophy in our society? Not to mention it being a heterosexual societal vampire disease contributing to alcohol and substance abuse in their victims.

Of course if the churches behind the YES ON 8 campaign would talk to their members on "The way to be," these churches would be vacant on Sundays and flat broke from not receiving 10% of all the tithes of the sexually deviant parishioners. They would be mad that they were called down on their "sins." They would rather blame the homosexuals for what they are really doing.

I am guessing that in the YES ON 8 campaign member's Bibles, they have taken a Sharpie and crossed out where it says in their favorite scripture at 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, "Neither fornicators, nor adulterers will inherit the Kingdom of God" next to the homosexuals. Notice in that scripture that the heterosexuals are lumped in the same category as the homosexuals and the murderers and thieves! One "sin" is not worse than the other.

As I ponder on these words I am under the assumption that we are all on the same playing field. So why is there not a proposition on the ballot to demand that heterosexuals keep their legs crossed and keep their hands off the spouses of other people and not glorify this in the media and schools as our kids are taught about divorce? Why not have a proposition to admonish the heterosexuals who are men of violence...rapists and pedophiles and to keep their hands off other people's women and children? It all seems so hypocritical.

This all makes me think about that "rafter" scripture and to truthfully accept everyone and "be putting up with each other and to love one another." After all, the homosexual community has had to put up with heterosexuals committing crimes against humanity against them and their children and getting away with it.

In Sonoma County, we had a district attorney who cared more about keepinga man out of jail - a Caucasian church-going married man - because he did not want him to lose his wife, new baby and job for raping a virgin teenager of gay parents. They were told that the victim "would lose the case regardless of physical evidence because the victim has two mothers which would not be looked favorably upon in court." Ah the ugly truth nobody wants to listen to!

I am a heterosexual married woman and mother of two teenagers. I have talked openly about sex and homosexuality with them. My children and I have a pretty open dialogue compared to my "religious" friends and family around me whose kids sneak around on them behind their back (whose kids tell me everything!) and who are going to vote yes on 8.

I urge everyone to VOTE NO ON 8 because it promotes hate, discrimination on the basis of sexual preference, class distinctions, prejudice and ignorance.

Rachele Ketchem
Sebastopol

Labels: ,


Read article »

NORA Proposition 5 Drug Treatment for Youth and Adults

As the Executive Director of the Drug Abuse Alternatives Center (DAAC), the largest provider of publicly funded alcohol and other drug treatment in Sonoma County, I have seen both the positives and negatives of Proposition 36, the precursor to Proposition 5. Overall, in my opinion, Prop. 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000, has been a success in Sonoma County and the State as a whole.


Ironically, I, along with many other treatment professionals, opposed Prop. 36 before it was passed. We were concerned that it had been written by outsiders who did not consult with California’s treatment providers and that it did not have strong enough sanctions for non-compliance with treatment, a key argument today by those who oppose Prop. 5.

In fact, I, and many others, turned out to be wrong. In Sonoma County, thousands of individuals have benefited from treatment instead of incarceration and our Public Safety has not been compromised. Statewide, 200,000 have received treatment and UCLA’s study of Prop. 36 not only showed that treatment has worked, but also that it has saved California over $2 Billion since 2000. The only negatives I have seen are that Prop. 36 has been under-funded which has caused long treatment waits and that no provision was made for treatment for youth.

Prop. 5 will improve on Prop. 36 by:


• Providing a systematic treatment system for adults that will unify the current system of Diversion, Prop. 36 Treatment and Drug Courts into one system with three tracks. Track 3, Drug Court, will not be eliminated, as some have said, but will, in fact, be funded at twice the level it is now.

• Providing $65 Million state-wide for funding of treatment for adolescents which will meet the spectrum of youth needs including family therapy, educational and employment stipends, mental health interventions and much more. Prop. 5 will provide services to youth before they get into trouble with the law.

Prop. 5 will do all this without compromising public safety. Judges, not the offender, will determine whether to send the individual to treatment or to jail. Offenders convicted of serious and violent crimes and sex offences will not be eligible.

Prop. 5 will also reform the prison and parole systems. Currently California spends $46,000 per year to house each inmate (twice the national average) and yet our recidivism rate is almost 70%, while nation-wide recidivism is about 35%. By reducing the number of parolees who are returned to prison for dirty urinalysis tests and allowing them to receive treatment, Parole Agents will be able to concentrate their efforts on supervising parolees who were originally incarcerated for serious and violent crimes.

Prop. 5 will do all this with no new taxes and save the State an estimated $2.5 Billion in its first few years according to the impartial and non-partisan Legislative Analysts Office. Our current system is clearly not working. Please join me, the League of Women Voters, the California NAACP and many other organizations and individuals in voting yes on Proposition 5.

Michael Spielman, MFT
Executive Director
Drug Abuse Alternatives Center
2380 Professional Drive, Santa Rosa
(707) 571-2233 x 308

Labels: , , ,


Read article »

Thursday, October 16, 2008

VOTING 2008

Beyond Gender, Race, and Ethnic Origin

I published my opinions on candidates and issues in the October 16th edition of the West County Gazette because people ask me my opinion - then tell me I actually have influence on readers. OK, the if I do - here foes. Here's how I'm voting on issues I have studied so far. I still have a long way to go on the propositions of which I am short on knowledge. So much to learn. So important to vote intelligently. Our world is in flux an that's a very good thing.

VOTING 2008
Beyond Gender, Race, and Ethnic Origin
By Vesta Copestakes

My Voter’s Pamphlet and mail-in ballot sit on my kitchen table, waiting for me to make intelligent decisions – yes or no. In some cases it’s quite obvious to me because I tend to vote with my value system. In others, I need to know more and delve into the text, read the pros and cons, and if I feel qualified to make a sound decision, I mark my ballot. If I feel too ignorant on any subject, I leave it blank.

I won’t vote by gender for a woman just because I’m female and she’s female. She needs to be intelligent, calm, thoughtful, considerate and knowledgeable about the position for which she is running.

I won’t vote for a black or oriental or Indian person just because I want to see more faces among my government officials in charge who truly represent our population. It’s my preference, but that person is more than a person of color or race, s/he is the person I trust with decisions over matters that I know nothing.

I won’t vote for an ethic minority or gay/lesbian person for the same reasons as females and race. Yes, I’d love to see people who have suffered under the prejudices of white male rule come forward and represent their communities. But whoever is running needs to earn my respect and stand above me and the rest of us as qualified for the position.

That means I can’t make easy decisions – like I’ll vote for her or him just to even out the gender/race/ethnic, etc. balance in our government. Over time, I am seeing that balance come about. Some things just take many years to accomplish and I’m a patient person. An unqualified person who fails or blunders does no one any good.

My Ballot – so far:

President/Vice president – Obama/Biden.
This is an easy choice for me. These are two very intelligent and strong individuals who remain calm in the face of drama, who take the time to think things through carefully and who have my basic values in their hearts. I watch them with awe and respect. That’s what I want in the leaders of my country. People far superior to me.

U.S. Representative - Lynn Woolsey. If nothing else I admire her right-thinking around the Iraq war and her persistence in working toward goals I find commendable. There have been instances when I don’t agree with her, but what else is new. The majority of the time I feel well-represented by a person who gets things done.

Farm Animals – I’ve never been able to cage an animal. This is a heart issue for me – not an economic one. If I were that animal, how would I feel confined to a small space. Miserable and helpless. No being deserves to feel that way and we as humans have no right to do that to innocents.

Parental Notification – this is so wrong it hurts. It makes girls victims once more. Boys run free, girls pay the price. Many girls cannot talk freely with their parents. They will run away, find illegal abortions, hurt themselves – you name it. So many girls will pay too high a price if this passes.

Non-Violent Offenders – this is economically as well as socially important. People fall victim under the influence of drugs and alcohol and make mistakes. These are not violent people. They are people who need help. Throwing them in jail costs way too much money and does them – and society no good.

Matrimony for Same-Sex Couples – of course. What right have we to tell people who love each other that they can’t have the same benefits of marriage as the rest of us. How very wrong to deny them both the legal and emotional bonds of matrimony. This is a discrimination law and is not to be tolerated.

5th District Supervisor this is my district and like so many – I find Efren Carillo a very nice man, but I’m voting for Rue Furch. I have watched her for years at Planning Commission meetings and seen how her phenomenal knowledge about the infinite details on subjects have allowed her to educate her opponents, and therefore change their minds with information. Too many officials vote without these details. She consistently amazes me and has my support.

3rd District Supervisor – not my district but I am supporting Shirlee Zane. In many ways this is a vote against Sharon Wright. She is far more pro-growth than I see as healthy for this county. I’ve watched her for decades and she has never reflected my values.

SMART Train – this is a long-term benefit project and some times we just have to think that far into the future. I want to see this work. I come from the East Coast where trains like this are a matter of life and have been for many decades. It’s time we had one here. Once we have it, people will use it. It’s simply a smart alternative to commuting by car.

I have more studying to do before I fill out my ballot. But I can tell you that spending money is not high on my list. Why am I even telling you my opinion? Because people tell me I have influence, and it’s time to use it. I love my home, my country and my environment – and yes – they are all mine to take care of in ways that I consider prudent. Readers know my favorite phrase – we are all in this together. It is our mutual responsibility to VOTE wisely and with our hearts as well as our minds. Thanks for reading.

Labels: , , ,


Read article »

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

ACLU Voter Recommendations for California

The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) weighs in on specific propositions and makes recommendations.


The ACLU-NC believes that our priorities in California should be focused on building communities in which every child is safe and free to pursue his or her dreams. We believe that the only way to create safe communities for all Californians is through a balanced approach that includes investment in education and prevention and intervention to end violent crime. That’s why we urge you to vote NO on propositions 6 and 9 and YES on Proposition 5.

NO on PROPOSITION 6
Prop 6 is focused on the wrong priorities. We need real solutions to violent crime. But that’s not what Prop 6 provides. Prop 6 threatens to take funding away from the places we need it the most -- like education -- and to spend billions on the same costly and ineffective methods, such as incarcerating more youth, that have failed to help our communities, at great cost to all Californians. Learn more: http://defeatrunner.org/

NO on PROPOSITION 9
Prop 9 is a well intentioned but poorly written and truly dangerous initiative. It will negatively impact California’s most vulnerable residents -- our children -- by diverting hundreds of millions from schools and education to spending on prisons and jails. It puts huge burdens on local law enforcement and creates more red tape but does not provide new services to victims. Learn more http://www.votenoprop9.com/

YES on PROPOSITION 5
Prop 5, on the other hand, takes a sensible and balanced approach to the problem of non-violent crime. It offers common sense solutions to prison overcrowding by providing drug treatment as an alternative to incarceration for non-violent offenders, saving California taxpayers billions of dollars. Learn more http://www.prop5yes.com/

It’s time to focus on the right priorities. Vote NO on propositions 6 and 9 and YES on Proposition 5.

Our Mission:
The ACLU of Northern California works to preserve and guarantee the Bill of Rights for all, through litigation, public education, organizing, lobbying and legislation. Protecting freedom of expression, the right to privacy, and the right to be free of discrimination are fundamental goals of the ACLU.

ACLU of Northern California | 39 Drumm Street, San Francisco, CA 94111
T (main): 415.621.2493 | T (civil liberties counselor): 415.621.2488 | F: 415.255.1478
http://www.aclunc.org/

Labels:


Read article »

Monday, September 8, 2008

Yes on Prop 5

The Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act of 2008

There's no question that drugs and alcohol destroy not only the lives of the addicted, but also damage the lives of every person in close range of the addicted individual. Drugs and alcohol impact people in different ways, but no aspect of addiction can be seen as positive for the individuals involved, or society in general. Helping people get beyond addiction not only saves lives - it saves money. In the case of helping addicts - $1 spent saves $7 - please read more…


As you know there is a shortage of funding for alcohol and drug treatment in Sonoma County ...in fact 40,000 teens and adults have challenges with alcohol and other drugs - - IMAGINE THIS ....all the people living in the towns of Sonoma, Sebastopol, Cotati, Guerneville and Healdsburg!!

If this bill gets passed Sonoma County would have approximately $5M more dollars for education and treatment !! For every $1 spent in treatment it saves $7 in medical, legal and other social costs!

Timmens Cermak, MD who is speaking at the DAAC (Drug Abuse Alternative Center) Understanding Addiction Workshop on September 17th is an advocate for Prop 5. On September 24th there is a debate on this Proposition in Sonoma County - location to be announced.

For more information on Proposition 5, please contact:

Susan Anderson at DAAC: sanderson@daacmail.org and/or
Margaret Dooley-Sammuli, Yes on Prop. 5 at prop5@drugpolicy.org
Deputy Campaign Manager, Drug Policy Alliance Network
www.drugpolicy.org

Labels: ,


Read article »